The “TAKINGS” clause has been bastardized under Dems...
This helps stabilize it again, IMO.
Got into a battle with County Supes in N Callf over their desire/demand that every weed/ bush/ tree/ bird/ coyote/ bear/ cougar get INVENTORIED by “volunteers who could come on private property at any time without notice.
I made a big stink and I did NOT back down.
When they said that IF a volunteer got hurt on MY property & I would be liable-—I said I would see them in court.
I had bought HORSE PROPERTY-—not INVADER property.
LOVED eating them up in meetings-—Some were SRO. Many horse owners who, like me, paid premium prices for larger acreage.
Additional opinions issued today at 10:00 a.m.
We have the first opinion of the court today in Muldrow v. St. Louis.
It is by Justice Kagan, and the decision by the Eighth Circuit is vacated and remanded.
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193 [Arg: 12.6.2023]
Issue(s): Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in transfer decisions absent a separate court determination that the transfer decision caused a significant disadvantage.
Held: The court holds that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but the harm does not have to be significant.
Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh each have opinions concurring in the judgment.
Court’s opinion here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-193_q86b.pdf