You have to be doing a lot of recreational drugs to actually think President Trump has a shot at a fair and unbiased trial in New Yawk. ROTFLMAO. Idiots.
“I thought STRIKES were supposed to be ‘unlimited’ when we were picking our jury? I was then told we only had 10...”
I am not sure about unlimited, but a defense should have far more than ten strikes.
If he had resisted the path he took, the Media and their Democrats would have pinned EVERY death on him - and they would have made sure there were A LOT.
It was a brilliant trap.
Under Federal campaign law, if that money arguably could have another purpose, such as protecting a company’s brand or protecting the family, then it’s not campaign money.
The current DOJ under this regime has so weaponized and politicized the Department of Justice that DOJ will arrest political opponents for crossing the street.
Even they wouldn’t take this case.
🤣🤣. Trump gets free time to Campain in New York.
I know Seek bolded this part without comment, but the author lost me right here.
The charges were not felonies, they were misdemeanors that were converted into felonies via dubious means. Bragg still hasn't told anybody what the federal violation was that justifies his reviving dead misdemeanor charges.
-PJ
I will vote for Trump regardless.
If he’s a felon from this insane clown sideshow sham trial, I will vote for a felon.
If they take his name off the ballot I will write it in.
From what little I’ve seen, strikes without a reason are limited, but that might be according to the type or location of the case.
“Do you have opinions about the ability for a former sitting president to be tried in a court of law?“
The problem here is that we are talking about a Court of Law, we are talking about the dismissal and destruction of Law.
I thought STRIKES were supposed to be ‘unlimited’ when we were picking our jury?
Nobody thinks that. Of course there is a limit. lol.
I mean, jurors had to complete a 42 page questionnaire. If Trump’s lawyers are worth their weight in salt, they should have easily been able to pick the right ones to serve on the jury.
We live in NYS and ne7ther of us has gotten a jury summons in years, and both of us are long overdue.
I’m wondering if NYS has found a way to weed out conservatives/Trump supporters from the jury pool from the get-go.
Just don’t send them jury summons.
It’d be easy enough to use the FEC database to do this.
And I’m a Trump donor.
Inquiring minds want to know...
The odds that a single juror will be seated that is a rational conservative is 1000000 to 1.
I’m sure they are all like my cousin, needing to only wake them when it’s time to “deliberate.”