Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Baladas

Not really. As even Nate Silver wrote, they’re rapidly running out of low-hanging fruit states. Like this movement has less electoral votes right now than big loser Hillary Clinton received in 2016 (232).

Until a state that voted for Trump in 2016 signs on, it’s really not worth thinking about.


4 posted on 04/19/2024 2:35:03 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Trump20162020

I have wondered how SCOTUS could allow a state to void the will of its voters. If 52% of a state’s voters cast for Trump how can the state ignore that and give its electors to Biden. Also in most states isn’t it the electors who are actually chosen by the voters?
How is it allowable to dismiss them and replace them with another slate. Years ago SCOTUS made a big decision about one man one vote. It said states could not emulate the Senate in their state legislative or local legislative bodies. It was wrong for Staten Island to have as many state Senators as Brooklyn. IMHO this idea of overturning the voters choice is worse.


96 posted on 04/19/2024 5:14:51 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson