Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libstripper

Homelessness is simply NOT a federal government issue. The Constitution gives the feds NO authority or power over homelessness. It is a local/states’ issue. SCOTUS would get it right by remanding it to the state(s) where the issue belongs.

Common.

What will it take to get us back to our Free Constitutional Republic with a constitutionally VERY limited federal government and constitutional state sovereignty?


3 posted on 04/28/2024 10:38:48 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim W N

“Homelessness is simply NOT a federal government issue. The Constitution gives the feds NO authority or power over homelessness. “

Oh yeah? Next you’ll be saying the Federal Government has no place specifying what flavor tobacco should be, or what how many flushes per gallon my toilet should have, or what kind of light bulb I use. /s


6 posted on 04/28/2024 10:43:40 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N
Homelessness is simply NOT a federal government issue. The Constitution gives the feds NO authority or power over homelessness

Not only homelessness, but public safety/policing and banking regulation as well.

14 posted on 04/28/2024 11:12:58 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N

Woody Guthrie (yeah, a commie symp) wrote a tune called “Do Re Mi”. About the Dust Bowl days.

California had State Troopers on the roads at ports of entry. They would not allow people to enter the state without visible means of support. As in “Believe it t or not, you won’t find it so hot, if you ain’t a got the Do Re Mi” Cash. It was a substantial amount.

From the state of California’s perspective, unemployment was 25%, not counting ranchers or farmers. There were no jobs for them, and no way to feed them. No housing for them.

And no “Welfare” as it is understood today. Nothing. So turning away hordes of impoverished - without the means to help them, what is the immediate short term answer?


21 posted on 04/28/2024 11:34:50 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N; All
Thank you for referencing that article Jim W N.

"Homelessness is simply NOT a federal government issue. The Constitution gives the feds NO authority or power over homelessness. It is a local/states’ issue. SCOTUS would get it right by remanding it to the state(s) where the issue belongs."


I agree 100%.

First, the bottom line.

The broader picture about homeless is his. The corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties are working to establish a permanent puppet presidency that will unquestioningly sign unconstitutional taxing and spending bills into law.

But more specifically concerning how unconstitutional, unaccountable federal government taxes are huring the homeless, consider this. As a consequence of corrupt Congress's abuse of its repealable 16th Amendment powers (direct taxes), Congress is effectively stealing state revenues, including citizen's wallets, by means of taxes that the post-17th Amendment ratification Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers and a few other constitutionally enumerated expenses.

In other words, there is a bunch of "federal" taxes, actually state revenues imo, that should never have left the states, revenues that the states could be using to take care of the homeless and many other things.

Note that Justice Joseph Story had explained that "poor laws" are a state power issue.

Federal government welfare is unconstitutional imo, just a way for corrupt politicians to buy votes.

The remedy for unconstitutionally big federal government oppressing everybody under its boots...

Democratic and Republican Trump supporters not only need to support hopeful Trump 47 with a new patriot Congress so that Trump will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but the new Congress has to support Trump to do the following concerning unconstitutional federal taxes.

Trump needs to lead the states to put a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes by effectively "seceding" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government by repealing the 16th and 17th Amendments (16&17A).

Consider the repealing of 16&17A as part of reparations for victim taxpayers of the corrupt federal government for having to pay a lifetime of unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot reasonably justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers and a few other constitutionally enumerated expenses.

Again, the broader picture is that corrupt political party and media fuss about "obsolete" electoral college is because the electoral college is the only thing stopping the corrupt political parties that have pirated control of state and federal governments from establishing a permanent puppet presidency that will unquestioningly sign unconstitutional taxing and spending bills into law.


35 posted on 04/28/2024 12:55:51 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N

This is actually a case where it looks like SCOTUS will undo a bad policy adopted by the Ninth Circuit Cout of Appeals. See, FTA:

“Grants Pass lawyers explain that the 9th Circuit has “erected a judicial roadblock” affecting virtually every municipality in the West, preventing them from clearing encampments. The results are “crime, fires, the reemergence of medieval diseases, environmental harm, and record levels of drug overdoses, and deaths on public streets.”

“Phoenix city officials, in a friend-of-the-court brief, complain that 9th Circuit judges are acting like “homeless policy czars,” usurping what local governments should decide. Justice Brett Kavanaugh echoed that, warning against having “federal courts micromanaging” homeless policy.”


46 posted on 04/29/2024 7:15:35 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson