Skip to comments.
US government warned of potential for attack five days ago
silicon ^
| 9/12
Posted on 9/12/2001, 1:25:39 PM by oxi-nato
A State Department website warned of possible terrorist attack late last week. Dated 7 September, the warning says US citizens are under increased threat from attack by groups allied to Osama bin Laden.
It continues: "In the past, such individuals have not distinguished between official and civilian targets."
It highlights fears that military personnel in Japan or Korea could be targeted. The warning calls on US citizens to remain vigilant and increase their security awareness.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
9/12/2001, 1:25:39 PM
by
oxi-nato
To: oxi-nato
President to address the nation at 10:45 am per Fox
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: oxi-nato
Got the url for this?
4
posted on
9/12/2001, 1:36:27 PM
by
Ed_in_NJ
To: oxi-nato
The warning calls on US citizens to remain vigilant and increase their security awareness.I don't remember anyone mentioning this to me within the last few days...
5
posted on
9/12/2001, 1:36:58 PM
by
Iscool
To: oxi-nato
The warning calls on US citizens to remain vigilant and increase their security awareness.
Would this have stopped those people from going to work at the WTC or people from getting on those planes....We'll never know but I doubt it. In the "Left Behind" series everyone goes on with their daily lives despite the fact that nuclear bombs are going off. I found this completely ridiculous.....Now it seems perfectly believable.
6
posted on
9/12/2001, 1:42:53 PM
by
dubyagee
To: oxi-nato
How many vague warnings of this sort have been issued to Americans abroad in the last year?
To: CELTICGAEL (Celt)
President to address the nation at 10:45 am per Fox The period of about 10am through midnight tonight (eatern time) corresponds to overnight time in the area from Afghanistan to Lybia. I wouln't be surprised if we hear some news sometime in that period.
I'd be disappointed if we didn't.
8
posted on
9/12/2001, 1:46:46 PM
by
sanchmo
To: Ed_in_NJ
To: oxi-nato
http://www.emergency.com/cntrterr00.htm Not a matter of "if" but "when."
Any individual who knows the future should be on wall street. (Well maybe thats not such a safe location any longer.)
I think the analysis of "low-tech" assymetric threats have been driven home.
To: dubyagee
"Left Behind" series everyone goes on with their daily lives despite the fact that nuclear bombs are going off. I found this completely ridiculous.....Now it seems perfectly believable. Yes it is. During the bombing of Berlin by the allies, Germans got up every morning and went to work, even after bus and streetcar lines were knocked out. It's a human thing to carry on and stay involved in life even when the world is crashing around them. Takes your mind off your troubles and probably keeps you sane.
I was furious with the media yesterday who kept whining about "psychological damage" WTC destruction would cause. Total feminazi-ization of thought. The media in 1941 never hinted that bombing of Pearl Harbor would weaken the strength and resolve of citizens.
To: oxi-nato
I find your headline misleading ... 'warned of attack' seems to imply that we had warning of this specific attack ... warning that increased activity in the Pacific Rim is possible is hardly indicative of a large scale domestic attack on NYC. In the Pacific and IO op areas we get DAILY warnings of some sort or another.
If someone wants to go public and try to claim that the intel community had forewarning I think they need to be prepared to come to the table with a truckload of information. I want details about who knew and when. I want definitions of operators, plans, points of origin, and potential targets. If you come to play with anything less you are doing nothing more than slandering the people who are on the front lines doing their best to protect us with the limited resources allowed them by 8 years of neglect.
If you intend to paint the blood on someone's hands for this I hope to God you have the integrity to go about it with enough info to slap the cuffs on them while you're there ... anything less is just conspiracy mongering and anti-gov rhetoric. In short: put up or shut up, this is no time for BS.
To: BlueNgold
Poster of this thread is IMHO trying to "bend" information normally supplied from source in post # 9. I recieve these threat briefings every day via e-mail (anyone can sign up for such at the web site).
To "bend" (polite word here at FR) such data is ,as you state, irresponsible IMHO.
Stay Safe....
To: PoisedWoman
I was furious with the media yesterday who kept whining about "psychological damage" WTC destruction would cause. Total feminazi-ization of thought. The media in 1941 never hinted that bombing of Pearl Harbor would weaken the strength and resolve of citizens.
I agree to an extent, but a moment of reflection wouldn't have hurt either. I feel like kids should have been let out of schools to be with their families, but the schools in my area apparently felt like they could handle explanations better than the parents could. That angers me. I don't expect life to stop but we were basically "under attack". It was shocking and hasn't happened to that extent before. I feel we should have all been with our families, as was possible.
To: oxi-nato
I think we should also consider also the possibility that fellow Americans could have done such an attack. It is likely and possible. Unfortunately some fellow Americans would probablly do such a thing to their own countrymen. I am curious to know if any of the people who called from the Airplane give any description of who the highjackers were. I find it out that there is no mention of that period. One would think if they were middle eastern that some mention would have been made to their loved ones.
To: dubyagee
A thought about being warned. Is it believable that while our intel guys were blind that the Mossad were not. That they knew this was going down and said nothing. It's a scenario I do not want to believe, but it's just as hard to believe that this could be pulled off without someone knowing, and the most effective someone is the Mossad. Comments...
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: dubyagee
A thought about being warned. Is it believable that while our intel guys were blind that the Mossad were not. That they knew this was going down and said nothing. It's a scenario I do not want to believe, but it's just as hard to believe that this could be pulled off without someone knowing, and the most effective someone is the Mossad. Comments...
To: PoisedWoman
The feminization of this country is one of the reasons we were attacked. Our leaders are deluded by this idea that everyone wants democracy. "If we are just nice to them, they will learn how to be like us." The peoples of the middle east are culturally different and will never change. Bill Clintons feminine approach to these animals is what earned us the hatred we are receiving.
It is now time to show some masculine barbarism and let them know that if you F*** with us we will kill all of you, grind your bodies into the dirt, and salt the ground so that nothing grows there for a hundred years.
To: xkaydet65
Comments...
If the mossad knew, our guys should have known. We are constantly threatened by terrorist attacks. Many, I'm sure, that Americans never hear about. We probably were warned about this one, but I don't believe anybody knew the extent to which it would go down, or the targets, or the "weapons" that would be used. I still have enough faith in this country to believe that had that been the case, the terrorists would never have succeeded. I can only hope I'm never proved wrong.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson