Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OSAMA BIN LADEN SAID TO HAVE NUKES - Terrorists With Suitcases
WorldnetDaily ^ | April 28, 2001 | By Jon Dougherty

Posted on 09/12/2001 6:09:38 PM PDT by Uncle Bill

Bin Laden Said To Have Nukes

Report: Extent of fugitive leader's arsenal 'no longer a doubt'

WorldnetDaily
By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
April 28, 2001

Fugitive Saudi terrorist-sponsor Osama bin Laden is now known to have nuclear weapons, putting to rest previous speculation that left the possibility open, according to a weekly intelligence newsletter.

A report published in this week’s Geostrategy-Direct.com newsletter, edited in part by Washington Times staffers Bill Gertz and Robert Morton, indicated that bin Laden's possession of nuclear devices "is no longer a doubt."

"Saudi billionaire fugitive Osama bin Laden has nuclear weapons. The question is how many," the report said.

Gertz told WND he didn't write the assessment, but that the newsletter's primary editor, Morton, had a stringer in the Mideast who verified the information. Morton was out of his office and could not be reached for comment.

"Russian intelligence sources who are fighting bin Laden members in Chechnya believe [he] has a handful of tactical nuclear weapons," said the report. "Arab intelligence sources say the Al Qaida head has as many as 20 weapons."

Al Qaida is the name of the terrorist group bin Laden leads.

The report says "both sides agree" that the Saudi terrorist managed to acquire his weapons by supporting the Chechen cause with money and volunteers, in exchange for nuclear materials and technology.

Bin Laden "received [it] from Chechen insurgents who raided [Russian] nuclear installations for fuel and components around the former Soviet Union," the report said.

"With that came the recruits from among scientists from the former Soviet Union. The rest was easy," said Geostrategy-Direct.com.

The report said the actual location of the weapons is unknown, but "the assessment by both Arab and Russian sources is that bin Laden has managed to sneak at least some of the components to his lair in Afghanistan."

Bin Laden is one of the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitives. He is wanted in connection with the Aug. 7, 1998, bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa -- one in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and the other in Nairobi, Kenya. Over 200 were killed in the attacks.

He is believed to have a connection to the Oct. 12 bombing of the destroyer USS Cole as it refueled in Yemen, WND reported Oct 26.

The State Department had no comment on the report, but other intelligence officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, told WND that any reports dealing with bin Laden are taken seriously.

"Reports regarding bin Laden are always taken seriously and investigated," the official said. "He clearly poses a threat to U.S. interests around the world, so you can't dismiss every rumor out of hand. It wouldn't be prudent to do that."

In January, the New York Times -- quoting U.S. officials -- said bin Laden's organization was making attempts to manufacture chemical weapons and "buy enriched uranium," one of the main components of a nuclear device.

But as far back as August 1999, counter-terrorism experts said bin Laden may have acquired "up to 20 nuclear devices."

"Yosef Bodansky, a researcher of the House Task Force for Counter-terrorism and author of a new book on bin Laden, told a news conference on Friday that bin Laden has been seeking to follow up on his bombings of two U.S. embassies in east Africa one year ago. Echoing U.S. officials, Bodansky said bin Laden was thwarted in plans to blow up the U.S. embassy and two consulates in India last December and January," WorldTribune.com reported.

"It was also reported that bin Laden has biological, chemical and nuclear weapons and has received technical help from Iraq, Bodansky said. The nuclear weapons include suitcase bombs acquired through Chechen rebels," the paper said.

"The Russians believe that he has a handful [of nuclear weapons]. The Saudi intelligence services are very conservative. ... They are friendly to the United States [and] believe that he has in the neighborhood of 20," Bodansky said, as quoted by the Internet paper.

Bin Laden reportedly obtained and purchased the suitcase bombs from multiple sources, he said. He has a "collection of individuals knowledgeable in activating the bombs" and "is recruiting former Soviet special forces [to learn] how to operate the bombs behind enemy lines," Bodansky said.

He noted that, according to his research, most of the weapons had been transferred through Pakistan.

Related stories:

Bin Laden Joins Arafat

Oklahoma City Blast Linked To Bin Laden

Suspect Pegged In Cole Bombing

Bin Laden Calls For War Against U.S.

U.S. Covert Bin Laden Mission

Is Bin Laden A Nuclear Power?

Suitcase Terrorism

"More than three months ago Bodansky reported that Osama bin Laden may have acquired up to 20 suitcase nuclear bombs from Russia, smuggled to him by Chechen rebels. Also according to Bodansky, bin Laden was looking to hire former Russian spetsnaz commandos who knew how to operate suitcase nuclear bombs."

FBI Admits That Russian Nuclear Suitcases Hidden In Secret Locations In U.S.

Are Suitcase Nukes on the Loose?

FRONTLINE: Atomic Suitcase Bombs

Former Soviet spy: Small nuclear devices planted in U.S.
"A hooded, former Soviet spy with tales of threats to U.S. security was the star witness at a congressional hearing this week in California. The one-time military intelligence colonel testified that suitcase-sized nuclear devices are hidden on U.S. soil. "

Saudi Money Aiding Terrorist bin Laden

USA TODAY
By Jack Kelley
10/28/99- Updated 11:12 PM ET

WASHINGTON - More than a year after the U.S. Embassy bombings in East Africa, prominent businessmen in Saudi Arabia continue to transfer tens of millions of dollars to bank accounts linked to indicted terrorist Osama bin Laden, senior U.S. intelligence officials told USA TODAY.

The money transfers, which began more than five years ago, have been used to finance several terrorist acts by bin Laden, including the attempted assassination in 1995 of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Ethiopia, the officials said.

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright is expected to raise the issue with Prince Sultan, the Saudi defense minister, during his visit to Washington next week. Saudi Arabia, the main U.S. ally in the Persian Gulf, has pledged to fight terrorism.

According to a Saudi government audit acquired by U.S. intelligence, five of Saudi Arabia's top businessmen ordered the National Commercial Bank (NCB), the kingdom's largest, to transfer personal funds, along with $3 million diverted from a Saudi pension fund, to New York and London banks.

The money was deposited into the accounts of Islamic charities, including Islamic Relief and Blessed Relief, that serve as fronts for bin Laden.

The businessmen, who are worth more than $5 billion, are paying bin Laden "protection money" to stave off attacks on their businesses in Saudi Arabia, intelligence officials said. Bin Laden, whose family runs the largest Saudi construction firm, has called for the overthrow of the Saudi government.

The money transfers were discovered in April after the royal family ordered an audit of NCB and its founder and former chairman, Khalid bin Mahfouz, U.S. officials say. Mahfouz is now under "house arrest" at a military hospital in the Saudi city of Taif, intelligence officials said.

His successor, Mohammad Hussein Al-Amoudi, also heads the Capital Trust Bank in New York and London, which U.S. and British officials are investigating for allegedly transferring money to bin Laden. Amoudi's Washington lawyer, Vernon Jordan, could not be reached for comment.

Mahfouz's son, Abdul Rahman Mahfouz, is on the board of Blessed Relief in Sudan. Suspects in the Mubarak attack are linked to the charity.

Bin Laden faces U.S. criminal charges for allegedly masterminding the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people. Bin Laden, who is in Afghanistan, denies the charges.

Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan declined to comment on the reports.
[End of Transcript]

Bin Laden Funneled Money Through UAE Bank

Bin Laden Getting Financial Support - Links

Osama Bin Laden - Links

Osama Bin Laden’s International Terror Network

THE BCCI AFFAIR

Orrin Hatch Was BCCI’s Mouthpiece

Gold Depositories Buried Beneath Trade Center Rubble

....


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bcci; billgertz; binladen; moneytrail; nukes; obl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-229 next last
Standard Operating Procedure By Osama bin Laden:

Bin Laden under house arrest: report - September 13, 2001

Bin Laden under house arrest - September 13, 1998

Just curious, I wonder what the odds are that both articles are "September 13th." Satan must be laughing.

1 posted on 09/12/2001 6:09:38 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill, 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub, Yellow Rose of Texas, Alamo-Girl, FrogMom, Bump in the night.
bump
2 posted on 09/12/2001 6:14:13 PM PDT by amom (grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Was it Einstein that said man never had a weapon he did not use?

Also, if they use a Nuke, will we use ours? If we did use ours, how many would we drop?

3 posted on 09/12/2001 6:16:50 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5, Senator Pardek
Bttt
4 posted on 09/12/2001 6:17:30 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
bump
5 posted on 09/12/2001 6:18:17 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Also, if they use a Nuke, will we use ours? If we did use ours, how many would we drop?

Did The Rapist even leave us enough to defend ourselves with by the time he left office?

6 posted on 09/12/2001 6:20:53 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: amom
I was listening on the radio today as Colonel David Hackworth, self-described 'America's most decorated soldier,' told Sean Hannity that we should use a 50 kt nuke to take out Bin Laden's camp. Just great . . . if that's where the nukes are.

Otherwise you can kiss the other 98% of New York City good-bye.

Our support for Israel carries a very heavy price.

7 posted on 09/12/2001 6:37:58 PM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Bin Laden builds two fortresses in Afghan desert

HUNTING OSAMA BIN LADEN

8 posted on 09/12/2001 6:43:05 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I believe it and I also believe the governemnt believes it which is why you won't see any sporting events in the near future. Large crowds are what these assholes are looking for.
9 posted on 09/12/2001 6:46:38 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
You know, I like WorldNetDaily and all - most of the time - but come on. If Oswami Ben Leaden had nukes he would have used them instead of going to all the trouble to get pilots trained, airliners simultaneously hijacked, and the having them crash into structures with pinpoint precision.
10 posted on 09/12/2001 6:48:37 PM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Also, if they use a Nuke, will we use ours? If we did use ours, how many would we drop

We are justified to use whatever weapons we have in the inventory. My hope is that our use is liberal. Air burst to minimize fallout.

"Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord,
He has trampled out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored,
He has loosed the fateful lighting of his terrible swift sword,
His truth is marching on."

11 posted on 09/12/2001 6:49:37 PM PDT by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
This is absolute garbage and shame on WND to publish such junk.
12 posted on 09/12/2001 6:51:35 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Uncle Bill
Backpacks

14 posted on 09/12/2001 6:51:37 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
We should not wait. Turn them to dust. Drop 20,000 flyers and several tons of Trade Center dust from aircraft 15 minutes before bombing. The flyers should state:

"In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return."
Gen.3:19(KJV)

15 posted on 09/12/2001 6:52:18 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
You won't understand,

But it's blood and bone now.

Whatever the story on Israel, Muslim pogroms in the 20's or palestinian cleansing in the 40's.

It's time to get it on. A price will be paid. Perhaps the extermination of Islam in the middle east. Perhaps not. Things are inevitable now.

Decide whose side you're on. If you would rather sit this one out doing peyote in the Mexican desert, well whatever.

For the rest of us, the die is cast.

16 posted on 09/12/2001 6:52:36 PM PDT by frumious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
You don't believe there are backpack nukes?

I bet last week you didnt believe 4 terrorists could hijack 4 large aircraft on the same day and dive into the Pentagon, WTC's and aim for the Whitehouse either.

Get it?

If you don't know, then may I suggest just reading the thread and get educated. No offense intended, I am on your side

17 posted on 09/12/2001 6:54:12 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
An open letter to a terrorist:

Well, you hit the World Trade Center, but you missed America. You hit the Pentagon, but you missed America. You used helpless American bodies, to take out other American bodies, but like a poor marksman, you STILL missed America.

Why? Because of something you guys will never understand. America isn't about a building or two, not about financial centers, not about military centers, America isn't about a place, America isn't even about a bunch of bodies. America is about an IDEA. An idea, that you can go someplace where you can earn as much as you can figure out how to, live for the most part, like you envisioned living, and pursue Happiness. (No guarantees that you'll reach it, but you can sure try!)

Go ahead and whine your terrorist whine, and chant your terrorist litany: "If you can not see my point, then feel my pain." This concept is alien to Americans. We live in a country where we don't have to see your point. But you're free to have one. We don't have to listen to your speech. But you're free to say one. Don't know where you got the strange idea that everyone has to agree with you. We don't agree with each other in this country, almost as a matter of pride. We're a collection of guys that don't agree, called States. We united our individual states to protect ourselves from tyranny in the world. Another idea, we made up on the spot. You CAN make it up as you go, when it's your country.

If you're free enough.

Yeah, we're fat, sloppy, easy-going goofs most of the time. That's an unfortunate image to project to the world, but it comes of feeling free and easy about the world you live in. It's unfortunate too, because people start to forget that when you attack Americans, they tend to fight like a cornered badger. The first we knew of the War of 1812, was when England burned Washington D.C. to the ground. Didn't turn out like England thought it was going to, and it's not going to turn out like you think, either. Sorry, but you're not the first bully on our shores, just the most recent.

No Marquis of Queensbury rules for Americans, either. We were the FIRST and so far, only country in the world to use nuclear weapons in anger. Horrific idea, nowadays? News for you bucko, it was back then too, but we used it anyway. Only had two of them in the whole world and we used 'em both. Grandpa Jones worked on the Manhattan Project. Told me once, that right up until they threw the switch, the physicists were still arguing over whether the Uranium alone would fission, or whether it would start a fissioning chain reaction that would eat everything. But they threw the switch anyway, because we had a War to win. Does that tell you something about American Resolve?

So who just declared War on us? It would be nice to point to some real estate, like the good old days. Unfortunately, we're probably at war with random camps, in far-flung places. Who think they're safe. Just like the Barbary Pirates did. Better start sleeping with one eye open.

There's a spirit that tends to take over people who come to this country, looking for opportunity, looking for liberty, looking for freedom. Even if they misuse it. The Marielistas that Castro emptied out of his prisons, were overjoyed to find out how much freedom there was. First thing they did when they hit our shores, was run out and buy guns. The ones that didn't end up dead, ended up in prisons. It was a big PITA then (especially in south Florida), but you're only the newest PITA, not the first.

You guys seem to be incapable of understanding that we don't live in America, America lives in US! American Spirit is what it's called. And killing a few thousand of us, or a few million of us, won't change it. Most of the time, it's a pretty happy-go-lucky kind of Spirit. Until we're crossed in a cowardly manner, then it becomes an entirely different kind of Spirit.

Wait until you see what we do with that Spirit, this time. Sleep tight, if you can. We're coming.

18 posted on 09/12/2001 6:54:46 PM PDT by B-Cause
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
. If Oswami Ben Leaden had nukes he would have used them

Ah Spiff, just you wait. When you least expect it . . . BOOM!

If he had nukes they might already be in the US. In Washington, in New York . . .

I live within 5 miles of Cheyenne Mountain and have direct line of sight to it from my front door. I'll tell you, it's on my mind.

19 posted on 09/12/2001 6:55:14 PM PDT by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Its an n-party Multiplayer game, with each group of parties changing between groups. You don't want to start tossing nukes like hand grenades, because quite frankly you won't be able to tell who is nuking who for what reason on rather short order. The nuclear block ain't the same ol' neighborhood it used to be. I simply hope those with wherewithal and cooler heads are respected by all national leaders to hold positions of authority and focus a minimal set of power structures to ensure ordely resolution of conflicts rather than another freeforall.

If he has them, the least of our worries would be him,...it would be the inability to identify who all the other players are at the table, in the room or theater.

20 posted on 09/12/2001 6:56:02 PM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
Not supporting Israel carries a heavier price.
21 posted on 09/12/2001 6:56:54 PM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gore3000, Spiff
You guys need to get out more. If you would have taken the time to read the links, our government admits that he has them. They even announced it at a press conference. Pretty cool huh? Maybe you guys want a video confession before he dusts, say, a Super Bowl?
22 posted on 09/12/2001 7:01:05 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
Our support for Israel carries a very heavy price.

Crawl away on your belly! Go back to your Islamic friends and wait for your doom.

23 posted on 09/12/2001 7:06:02 PM PDT by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I don't think it is possible to make a true nuclear implosion bomb smaller than a suitcase and <50 pounds. It is also very hard, and really, really dangerous to make a small bomb (there would definitely be detectable "accidents"). They would also require a lot of maintenance. They wouldn't be that powerful - not enough to destroy a city. A terror weapon, yes - but of course, they would soon be answered with a very large sheet of glass.
24 posted on 09/12/2001 7:07:03 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie (signa@phi.no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: B-Cause
BRAVO! BRAVO! THAT IS WONDERFUL! AMERICA LIVES IN ME! Love it!
25 posted on 09/12/2001 7:11:39 PM PDT by poweqi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Nukes would be his trump card, and his insurance policy. He may be threatening their use right now. Suitcase nukes ARE for real.
26 posted on 09/12/2001 7:12:03 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
"I don't think it is possible to make a true nuclear implosion bomb smaller than a suitcase and <50 pounds.

You don't know what you are talking about.
The Soviet Union had many thousand such bombs.
No one knows where they all are now.

27 posted on 09/12/2001 7:16:52 PM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Shootist
No way Bin Laden is behind this alone. Making him the boogie man for our need for vengence is a short sighted mistake. Remember the millennium bombs? Whoa, what terror, his infrastructure was for shit -- [the FBI] caught everybody. The guy ran. I mean, who brings explosives across the border in the trunk of a car -- past Customs? To quote Bob Baer ex CIA operative, "The Islamic Jihad in Lebanon are the pros, they fight 24 hours a day. They did the (Lebanese) civil war, they've fought everywhere else. They did (a terrorist bombing in) Buenos Aires, they did (a hijacking in) Bangkok, they can operate overseas ... they are pros, veteran Muslim fighters trained by Iranian instructors." Bin Laden is a dilatant. No way he pulled this off alone.
28 posted on 09/12/2001 7:17:27 PM PDT by david5616
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Great Post U B, I worked in the Rocky Flats plutomium bomb plant [years ago]. A nuke bomb must be reconditioned [rebuilt] about every 6 months. They ARE radioactive, ya know!
29 posted on 09/12/2001 7:20:08 PM PDT by constitution (HELP!! SAVE ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I would be very worried, except that this comes from World Net Daily, which is sometimes very good, and sometimes worse than the stupidest tabloid.
30 posted on 09/12/2001 7:22:17 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
If Usama doesn't have any nukes, perhaps we could give him some. Deliver them via tomahawk missiles.
31 posted on 09/12/2001 7:26:44 PM PDT by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Great post. Thanks for all you do.
32 posted on 09/12/2001 7:27:20 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: constitution
What are the security procedures for detecting nukes?
33 posted on 09/12/2001 7:30:35 PM PDT by david5616
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: constitution
What are the security procedures for detecting nukes, and how easy are they to possibly conceal or shield?
34 posted on 09/12/2001 7:32:26 PM PDT by david5616
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: david5616
What are the security procedures for detecting nukes?

Good question, I would suspect that NEST teams are probably combing the cities at night while we prepare our riposte against the terrorists.

35 posted on 09/12/2001 7:36:15 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: frumious
Perhaps the extermination of Islam in the middle east.

You're talking about genocide. I don't know if you're Jewish or not, but you have become one with Hitler.

I won't hit the abuse button on you, because I think it is fitting that your posting stand, as a testament to the moral depravity that I oppose.

Actually, we can't exterminate the Muslims. Their societies are largely agrarian, and they can simply evacuate their cities and live in the countrside -- where even a megaton-class nuke will kill at most a few thousand.

In contrast, even with a handful of suitcase weapons, they could wipe out tens of millions of people in our cities. And without the industrial infrastructure, a hundred million more would starve. It would be the end of the United States.

But you're willing to do that, so that Israel may survive. But then, even if we were to withdraw our support, Israel would probably continue to survive, given that they have nukes of their own. So basically, you're willing to attempt to destroy 400 million Muslims and most certainly end up destroying the United States of America as well, for the sole purpose of ensuring that Ariel Sharon can continue his moral posturing.

Which side are you on?

I know it's not the side that God's on, because he would never be on the side of a genocide. So don't expect any help from his quarter.

36 posted on 09/12/2001 7:40:27 PM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DittoJed2
Not supporting Israel carries a heavier price.

I can always tell when I'm blowing away an opponent in a debate, when all he can respond with is a baseless assertion.

Switzerland doesn't support Israel, and they seem to be doing all right.

37 posted on 09/12/2001 7:44:23 PM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
What's a NEST team?
38 posted on 09/12/2001 7:44:42 PM PDT by david5616
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
You're talking about genocide. I don't know if you're Jewish or not, but you have become one with Hitler.

You are a complete idiot. 20,000 AMERICAN DEAD and you dont have the stones to give them payback .... get out of my country you weakling.

Extermination of the originating countries is actually a pretty good solution. Make sure they NEVER hit us again.

39 posted on 09/12/2001 7:47:09 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: *mano*
Four years -- to the day -- since his last reported house arrest. Hadn't realized that.

(God bless Uncle Bill.)

40 posted on 09/12/2001 7:49:08 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Its time for a greater Earth. One without Islamic terrorists.
41 posted on 09/12/2001 7:50:40 PM PDT by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
If he had'em, he woulda used 'em.
42 posted on 09/12/2001 7:52:06 PM PDT by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
If he had'em, he woulda used 'em.
43 posted on 09/12/2001 7:52:20 PM PDT by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
You know I think its been too easy to find this trail of evidence. Could Osama have something else up his sleeve? Maybe mass suicide? Damn, I wanted to kill the son of a bitch.
44 posted on 09/12/2001 7:53:00 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I thought of that too. But maybe that is what was planned. I have questions, I can't help but notice this was so carefully planned and had many facets. We know that things went wrong for them, it was not a full success. I was scared that the last plane that went down may have had a nuke for it's true target. A cell phone caller said they had a bomb and were not going to let them do it. Maybe that is why they evacuated the whitehouse like that. I wasn't clear on something else, was airforce one under attack in Florida, perhaps this is where all the Florida focus comes in, Was a smaller plane trying to take off from the pilot school to hit bush as he scrambled after the final hit? The ultimate shock more devestating then yesterdays events would have been a nuke in dc at the end of this four pronged terror event and a dead president to boot.

I am still in shock but I think we need understand the full scope of the plan and then remove any possibilty of this ever happening again and quick for the sake of humanity and the future.

45 posted on 09/12/2001 7:53:16 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
Crawl away on your belly! Go back to your Islamic friends and wait for your doom.

Yes, yes, I'm a coward because I don't want to die for Israel. Isn't that the sole reason America exists, to be sacrificed for Israel? What better and more noble purpose could an American have, but to die for Israel?

Men, women, children -- all Americans -- line up and give your life for Israel! If it takes one hundred million of you, two hundred million of you -- who cares if it takes every single American? Israel will prevail! Horay, hurrah!

One thing I know about Muslims is, they're willing to die for their cause, and that is not cowardice. In contrast, some (I retain the hope that it is not all) Israelis seem eager to have American lives sacrificed to their cause, while they sit back and make snide remarks like, "Join the Club." And that is the most craven cowardice I can imagine.

46 posted on 09/12/2001 7:58:07 PM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
You know, I like WorldNetDaily and all - most of the time - but come on. If Oswami Ben Leaden had nukes he would have used them instead of going to all the trouble to get pilots trained, airliners simultaneously hijacked, and the having them crash into structures with pinpoint precision.

My first thought as well. If they got em, wouldn't they use them. It's not like they love human life too much to do it.

47 posted on 09/12/2001 7:58:09 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
Which side are you on?

It's a tricky question isn't it. And you?

One thing I know about Muslims is, they're willing to die for their cause, and that is not cowardice.

Willingness to die does not necessarily indicate a lack of cowardice. It could indicate a lack of understanding of the gift of life, especially when that death is for the purpose of killing thousands of innocents.

"Join the Club."

I have not spoken to any Israelis in regards to this tragedy. However, judging from the international reaction, the Muslims seem to be doing quite a bit more of the "join the club" bit than the Israelis, IMO.

while they sit back and make snide remarks

Ah, but we do that as well on Free Republic. So are we any different?

48 posted on 09/12/2001 8:07:39 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
Thats fine. We can think all we want.
49 posted on 09/12/2001 8:14:24 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sandur
"... If he had'em, he woulda used 'em."

I thought about this today before you posted here, and came to the conclusion that position may be 180-degrees incorrect.

Perhaps Usama bin Laden wouldn't have done this if he weren't already armed with nuclear weapons of some sort. Being precious to his cause, he wouldn't risk losing one without being sure to set it off no matter what cost. He's isn't a villain who's afraid of expending assets, you understand.

The safest position might be to use it against US troops sent to respond to an undeniable act of war and use it against them on his own turf. He's got no real love for Afghanistan, he just hangs his turban there. He's a Saudi, and he's from where the holiest site in Islam is found. What significance has Afghanistan got? By the time the US troops arrive, he'd already have left the country after seeing to it that the plan was staged perfectly.

Maybe he'd even be able to use Afghanistani military assets as part of the attack, if the stories about bin Laden being a supreme force commander of the Taliban militia are correct. His men aren't just soldiers, they're fanatics.

Who seriously believes the Taliban claim that they've detained bin Laden under 'house arrest' are true? It's just buying time as many see it.

Was the attack yesterday the execution of his grandest plan, or is it a preliminary set-up?

The shortest question to ask yourself is this: 'Would Osama Bin Laden have acted in such a spectacular manner on 9-11-2001 if he didn't have an ace up his sleeve?'.

He set out to destroy the White House, Air Force One, the Pentagon, and the biggest foreign symbol of Western finance -- the World Trade Center.

Was that the limit of his scheme? What could he possibly do for an encore? He knows this means inviting cataclysm.

It's either that, or you subscribe to the notion that bin Laden's has come to the conclusion that his efforts to secure and deliver a nuke will never see the light of day as long as he's alive (and dying of cancer supposedly), so he might as well just to send the terror pilots out now to execute their insidious plans.

Which makes more sense?

50 posted on 09/12/2001 8:31:16 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson