Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North: U.S. Journalists Protecting Osama bin Laden
NewsMax.com ^ | 9/21/01 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 09/21/2001 7:50:33 PM PDT by kattracks

U.S. reporters familiar with the whereabouts of terrorist ringleader Osama bin Laden, who killed at least 6,700 Americans in attacks on New York and Washington last week, are refusing to tell what they know to U.S. intelligence agencies, a former Reagan administration national security official charged Friday night.

"We know that there are American correspondents, people who work for news bureaus, both print and broadcast, who have interviewed Osama bin Laden," said former Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North, now a Fox News Channel consultant, in an interview on the network's "Hannity & Colmes."

"I asked one of them today, 'Have you talked to the CIA to tell them exactly where you were?'" North said. "And his answer was, 'No, I'm a journalist.'"

"I find that to be reprehensible," the former Reagan official added. "He's enjoying the blessings of this country but he won't tell the CIA where he interviewed Osama bin Laden."

North offered the troubling revelation after "H & C" co-host Sean Hannity asked him about the controversy over Cablevision's News 12 in New York, where station management currently prohibits newscasters from wearing patriotic symbols on-air.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

War on Terrorism


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: JeepInMazar
It seems silly to me that the CIA never sent "journalists" in there to interview him. They must have. If not, what a joke!

Yes, silly you. After the Church Commission in 1975, the CIA was explicitly forbidden (in law) to use journalist cover.

Now the journalists jump on the CIA for "dropping the ball".

41 posted on 09/21/2001 10:07:04 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
I have to laugh at your childlike naivete.

Do you really think that cruel foreign despots and evil warlords give our journalists a "pass" because of this stupid law?

Did you not consider that there is no such law preventing the Russians, French, Israelis, British, Dutch, Bolivians, Chinese etc etc etc from using journalist cover? That the despots still consider all journalists to be spies?

Sometimes seemingly intelligent folks say such laughable things.

42 posted on 09/21/2001 10:12:45 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Waco
Something similar to the old arab trick used to make a camel drink water?
43 posted on 09/21/2001 10:16:08 PM PDT by Not now, Not ever!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Isn't it amazing how these people hide behind the title of Journalists when they obviously don't know the basic rules of Journalism any other time? Objective reporting is not something we see anymore.
They should be taken to the room with the light and the dripping water and made to tell!
44 posted on 09/21/2001 10:21:25 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LLAN-DDEUSANT
North. He had Bin Laden personal locations in all those papers he shredded illegally, I am sure.

Yeah right and where's Hoffa?

45 posted on 09/21/2001 10:31:42 PM PDT by Taylor42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
So what are you suggesting? Should journalists be compelled to serve the state, as Ollie suggested tonight? Who would benefit from such a state of affairs?
46 posted on 09/21/2001 10:35:32 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
LOL
47 posted on 09/21/2001 10:39:56 PM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Who ever said that journalists should be forced to "serve the state"?

Prior to 1975 CIA field operatives were permitted to pretend to be journalists for obscure magazines. It was useful, it got access, it was a tool. Like pretending to be a salesman or field engineer. This is an SOP of EVERY other iintelligence service in the WORLD, except for our "pure as the snow by law" CIA.

Now, our talking heads condemn the CIA, which must spy with a hand tied. For pete's sake, they are not allowed to associate with nasty people any more! Then the media says "why didn't the CIA know what was going on in the terrorist groups?"

And they see no irony.

As far as the journalists who may have info on OBL but will not pass it on to the CIA, can you imagine a reporter stiffing the FBI about Japanese troop movements in 1942?

"IT'S A WAR!! GET USED TO IT!!"

48 posted on 09/21/2001 10:43:25 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Travis McGee
Journalists are one of the biggest reasons Bush refuses to conduct a media-event war and he has told the WH media repeatedly that his adminstration will not disclose any details regarding times, places, or sources prior to any mission.
50 posted on 09/21/2001 10:53:40 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I suppose they're protecting their sources. just like the administration and the "evidence" it has.
51 posted on 09/21/2001 10:55:30 PM PDT by gfactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grim
.If I'm not mistaken I believe CIA operatives are banned from imitating journalists and missionaries

And if im not mistaken, the CIA never breaks the rules. But what would Ollie North know about that?

52 posted on 09/21/2001 10:57:32 PM PDT by gfactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Bingo. And I think that 90% of what is being leaked and reported is "disinformation".
53 posted on 09/21/2001 10:57:33 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: Travis McGee
Who ever said that journalists should be forced to "serve the state"?

Ollie North. On "Hannity & Colmes". Last night.

As far as the journalists who may have info on OBL but will not pass it on to the CIA, can you imagine a reporter stiffing the FBI about Japanese troop movements in 1942?

No I can't. I also can't imagine a friendly reporter in 1942 either in Japanese territory or expecting to be under Japanese jurisdiction any time soon. Our 1942 man was in a position to help both himself and his country without putting himself or any friendlies -- military or civilian -- at risk.

I understand and applaud your focus on victory, but surely you can appreciate the ethic that strives to protect legitimately non-combattant civilians as much as possible -- including by executing out-of-uniform guerillas and spies. On a per capita basis, Vietnam was surely a far dirtier war than WWII, largely because the Viet Cong were hiding among the peasants. I'm told American soldiers sometimes found themselves doing some mighty unpleasant things, convinced that they had no choice. Do we really want to encourage more of the same now?

55 posted on 09/22/2001 4:50:13 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson