Confusion about whether the Endangered Species Act allowed water to be taken from a river delayed a water drop on a wildfire that killed four firefighters. The amount was relatively small and did not lead to the deaths. And what kind of reporting is this?
Are they a the concencus of people who have seen the report? Are they conclusions taken directly from the report itself? Are these the comments of the AP reporter?
Where are they now drawing the line between reporting and editorializing?
Refresh my memory.....wasn't the fire relatively small when they requested the water? As in almost contained or almost out? Hint to nature nazi's : fires get bigger when there is no water to put them out.