Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
Okay, you got me curious now. Would the bubbles need to be methane, or would ordinary air bubbles work as well? Assuming there is no explosion involved.

Carting a load of air around underwater sounds safer and more environmentally-friendly than a load of methane.

8 posted on 09/26/2001 9:03:42 PM PDT by marigold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: marigold
This sounds suspiciously like high school physics-not a strong subject for me.I will now have a "test coming up/didn't study" nightmare (LOL)
11 posted on 09/26/2001 9:10:58 PM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marigold
Any gass will do. We have means by which solids can be mixed to produce huge free quantities of gases, but in war, forget the environmentally freindly crap ... war is inherently environmentally dangerous.
14 posted on 09/26/2001 9:57:19 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson