Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
... there is no evidence of the first required step in the entire Evolutionary process

There is (protein molecules are formed in various natural ways) but no truly living cell has yet been produced in the lab. What of it? Are you saying that until that final step is taken, your sticking with Noah's Ark? No science is acceptable to you, until it has achieved finality? And until then, you're sticking with mythology? I suppose you won't ever visit a doctor, for anything, until all disease is conquered. Neat way to think. You happy with it?

111 posted on 09/27/2001 11:54:18 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
"There is (protein molecules are formed in various natural ways) but no truly living cell has yet been produced in the lab. What of it?"

There is no evidence of inanimate objects evolving into any animated form whatsoever. This means that there is utterly no EVIDENCE to support the first required step of the Evolutionary Process on an inanimate planet.

In science, one should be a bit suspicious of any theory that fails to find evidence to support the very first step of said theory.

I see, however, that you have religiousesque FAITH is said theory even without said evidence. That's fine, but call your beliefs religion because they aren't based upon tangible scientific evidence.

137 posted on 09/27/2001 12:45:38 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson