Coulter has it. She's a straight shooter, entertaining, and a sharp dresser. Goldberg is getting body-slammed. LOL. First he promotes her editorials, highlighting their most controversial elements, and then he turns on her. It reminds people of the cowardly boss in "Bewitched". "You're doing a great job... You're fired!" And Coulter is having a fun time while he is taking Tums. I love it.
As for the points of argument, racial profiling on planes, paying special attention to swarthy males is clearly a good idea. And "converting people to Christianity" is a rather vague statement. "How?" is the question she should have been asked. That was a springboard statement, well planned but not backed up by her girly-boy editor. If he had stood by her, they both would have gained. "How do you convert them?" "Through Christian charity and missionaries, of course." "Oh. Ok."
You've got it right! There is absolutely nothing in the two "offensive" columns that is qualitatively worse than the stuff Coulter has written for years. There's got to be more to this story.