Plenty of it. Read a biology textbook.
Perhaps _you_ should read something on science, or, preferably, logic. There is no evidence to directly dispute creationism. There is only evidence to dispute _literal_ creationism. It is neither scientific nor logical to say there is any sort of evidence the the process of evolution could not be the physical result of some divine intervention. It is not likely, but Occams Razor is not _evidence_, merely a useful expedient. It is an aid in forming a conclusion, but it not, in and of itself, _evidence_.
Thraka