Replies

VA A: 5 - I dont really care either way if they dig up Brown's body. I've seen the autopsy pictures and it looks like he was shot. Thats good enough for me. Be A: Well perhaps you should care. Exhuming Brown should be a high priority for the GOP because if it is true that Brown was shot then the whole DNC criminal mafia can be brought down ... including many in the liberal media who undeniably helped hid the facts about the case from the public. And by the way ... there was NO AUTOPSY ... only an "examination" of the body. The WHOLE POINT is that an autopsy SHOULD HAVE been done and if the Bush/Ashcroft won't do it now then we should be asking WHY come the next election.

First, VA Advogado, how did you get to see the autopsy/"examination" photos of Ron Brown when they have never been published? Are you in the gov't. and privileged to see photos that have been kept from the public? Inquiring minds want to know... The only thing is, you never answer the hard questions but just keep repeating fuzzy mantras about Johnny Chung being a criminal, Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch, etc., without EVER acknowledging and/or refuting any info. we have given. My claim that you are a leftist posing as a moderate still stands as you have yet to refute it.

Second, Be A Chooser, why wait till next election to start asking questions? Bush/Ashcroft should be asked those questions NOW - not 3 years from now!

The one real problem I have with MOST Republicans is that they don't do anything - as long as there is a Republican in the Oval Office. For 3.5 years they go into hibernation and only do something when an election is forthcoming. In the meantime, the Dems. are working as rust, 'round the clock, to take away our constitutional liberties, etc. Those self-same Republicans chant their mantra of, "But we've got a decent guy in the White House!" and they don't ask tough questions.

Larry Klayman IS asking tough questions of Bush. The lazy Republicans who hide behind their self-righteous mantra don't like Larry's questions, but WHO ELSE is asking those questions? For one thing, why the hell hasn't Bush rescinded all those Constitution-busting Executive Orders issued by Clinton? For example, EO 13166 - the one that says everyone in this country WHO CAN'T SPEAK ENGLISH has a "right" to be provided an interpreter. What about rescinding Clinton's unconstitutional Presidential Decision Directive 25 ("PDD 25")? That is so secret that when Michael New tried to have it subpoenaed for his court-martial trial, it was refused as being "Classified" or "Top Secret." Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say that the executive branch has the authority to create policy and law for the country? We are not living in a kingdom, we live in a republic. No president has the constitutional authority to do the stuff Clinton got away with nor does Bush, just because "he's a decent guy!"

Let's remember that prior to WWII, Hitler had a meeting with the clergy in Germany. The clergy were falling all over Hitler instead of asking tough questions. Only one clergyman got up and asked tough questions of him. The others held in their horror - how could someone question der fuehrer? Turns out, the one lone clergyman was correct and the rest of the clinging cloying clergy were nothing but sheeple. The name of the concentration camp in Germany escapes me but there is a plaque on the door leading to it with an apology from the clergy. (Focus on the Family had an audio tape about this a few years back. It was one of the most popular.)

Yeah, I like the guy who asks tough questions. Life is like a turtle, you don't get anywhere unless you stick out your neck. Larry Klayman sticks out his neck and asks tough questions. My kind of guy. GO KLAYMAN GO! GO JUDICIAL WATCH GO!!

This is the photo I am referring to. The site that I have bookmarked for the Ron Brown case say this is an autopsy photo. Click on the photo to see the rest of the site. The definition of autopsy is pretty simple:

Main Entry: au·top·sy
Pronunciation: 'o-"täp-sE, 'o-t&p-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -sies
Etymology: Greek autopsia act of seeing with one's own eyes, from aut- + opsis sight, appearance -- more at OPTIC
Date: 1678
1 : an examination of a body after death to determine the cause of death or the character and extent of changes produced by disease
2 : a critical examination, evaluation, or assessment of someone or something past

So again, Miss Print, you have put forth inaccurate, misleading and factually WRONG information. I have no problem with people asking the tough question, its the accurate answers you seem to have a little trouble with. May I politely suggest you stop defending these Hillary supporters, stop giving aid and comfort to the enemy, stop obfuscating for those that want to bring harm to our president and his family (Judicial Watch) and work towards seeing more of them punished for the sordid things they've done to this country. Remember, you're either with us, or against us.

First, VA Advogado, how did you get to see the autopsy/"examination" photos of Ron Brown when they have never been published?

Actually, the important photos of the head wound and the x-ray of Brown's skull, which were taken by Janowski during the examination, have been published on the web (go to www.newsmax.com) and the AFIP has verified that they are authentic. However, no published government document contains those images, nor have they ever been published by the mainstream media. In fact, the originals of both are unexplainably (wink, wink) missing from a LOCKED safe at AFIP that only a few people supposedly had access to.

Second, Be A Chooser, why wait till next election to start asking questions? Bush/Ashcroft should be asked those questions NOW - not 3 years from now!

Oh I agree and have been asking the questions for some time here on FreeRepublic, at the RNC website, the local Republican chapter and the media (like letters to Fox News). However, the Republicans have till the next election before I really get vocal. Then, life long Republicans like me are going to be asking questions that will definitely make the GOP nervous because unlike the nonsense the democRATS usually spout, our questions will be backed up with undeniable facts. Covering up a murder makes one complicit in the murder. And this is a mass murder related to TREASON. And, by the way, I pretty much agree with everything else you just posted.

"Larry Klayman IS asking tough questions of Bush. The lazy Republicans who hide behind their self-righteous mantra don't like Larry's questions, but WHO ELSE is asking those questions? For one thing, why the hell hasn't Bush rescinded all those Constitution-busting Executive Orders issued by Clinton? For example, EO 13166 - the one that says everyone in this country WHO CAN'T SPEAK ENGLISH has a "right" to be provided an interpreter. What about rescinding Clinton's unconstitutional Presidential Decision Directive 25 ("PDD 25")? That is so secret that when Michael New tried to have it subpoenaed for his court-martial trial, it was refused as being "Classified" or "Top Secret." Where in the U.S. Constitution does it say that the executive branch has the authority to create policy and law for the country? We are not living in a kingdom, we live in a republic. No president has the constitutional authority to do the stuff Clinton got away with nor does Bush, just because "he's a decent guy!""

Larry is about the only person, besides Congressmen Ron Paul, who does asks the tough questions. And sometimes, when in doubt, it is wise to ask. Also, we do live in a republic and not a kingdom! We have a right to question authority figures! The President is not the law of the land. The Constitution is! Furthermore, I was really disappointed to hear Matt Drudge run Larry off yesterday evening when it was Larry trying to make a point about the Bush-Bin Laden connection. Larry was correct in addressing this point and for Matt Drudge to make Larry look like an idiot just makes Drudge sound like one. What does Drudge know about this Bush-bin Laden connection? Inquiring minds want to know. I do.