Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr
I understand your point. But I do telco software for which Java is too slow. Most people can get by with fast processors and lots of RAM on their desktop.
29 posted on 10/30/2001 8:17:51 AM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: KayEyeDoubleDee
But I do telco software for which Java is too slow.

Agreed, I would not yet reccommend Java for an application that reads/writes from a hard drive a few thousand times a minute, or does *serious* number cruching, or does a lot of 'hardware' controls. Altho you might spend less in the long run by just writing a Java program and buying more hardware power, compared to writing, performance tuning and debugging C++ code. If developer time counts as a 'cost' . . . Java code writes and debugs in about half the time as C++, so the end-result is the C++ program costs far more.

But for client/server, rich-client distributed software . . . Java is the *only* sensible choice.

38 posted on 10/30/2001 10:06:43 AM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson