Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only A Year Late-Fla. Recount Data Delivered 11/5, Public by 11/12
National Journal ^ | November 1, 2001 SGT | Hotline Daily Briefing

Posted on 11/01/2001 9:06:10 AM PST by umbra

Top News

ONLY ONE YEAR LATE

FL recount data to be delivered to consortium 11/5, released to public 11/11 or 11/12.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2000; floridarecount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
Bush might have won huge, just a good feeling about this..
1 posted on 11/01/2001 9:06:10 AM PST by umbra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: umbra
Well the ultra-liberal today show believes that Algore really won. Oh and then Katie Couric could have been the press-secretary.
2 posted on 11/01/2001 9:07:39 AM PST by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umbra
No he didn't. Just ask Jeff Toobin or Katie Couric.
3 posted on 11/01/2001 9:08:27 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umbra
Of course Gore won; that is, if you use the fair, reasonable objective criteria that every person who read Gore's name on the ballot intended to vote for him.
4 posted on 11/01/2001 9:10:47 AM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
There were any number of these media reviews of the Florida ballots earlier this year. This is non-news.

The results will never be more official or accurate than they were last December, and the liberals need to get that through their thick skulls.

5 posted on 11/01/2001 9:11:57 AM PST by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: william clark
Of course Gore won, why who knows how many people meant to vote for him and got tied up, well, being tied up, whatever they do when they aren't bothering to work.
6 posted on 11/01/2001 9:12:09 AM PST by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: william clark
More like those who could not read Gore's name voted for him.
7 posted on 11/01/2001 9:12:12 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coop
LOL. Toobin is such an empty suit...
8 posted on 11/01/2001 9:12:27 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: umbra
Just for a second consider....

What if this "consortium" announces that upon further review

Algore actually won florida.....

What on earth would happen???

any scholars out there?

9 posted on 11/01/2001 9:12:37 AM PST by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark
I know the accounts that work with JW. Bush won! The libs could try every loose standard they choose to prove they point. JW used the laws of the county to prove how won! Bush
10 posted on 11/01/2001 9:14:16 AM PST by man from mars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: umbra
I may sound naive, but why the 5th? Why public by the 12th? Facts are facts, end of story. When a story is not a matter of fact, then it needs to be disseminated accordingly.
11 posted on 11/01/2001 9:14:34 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: WhiteGuy
What if this "consortium" announces that upon further review Algore actually won florida..... What on earth would happen???

Nothing at all. These "recounts" are not official and are probably inaccurate. The official vote counting and recounting stopped last December. It can never be restarted again. Otherwise we could make Nixon president in 1960 instead of Kennedy.

13 posted on 11/01/2001 9:17:42 AM PST by Gorest Gump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
that upon further review Algore actually won florida.....

Winning occurs in the Electoral College. Florida can have ten thousand recounts with variable results. None of them matter.

14 posted on 11/01/2001 9:17:52 AM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: man from mars
Would have, could have, might have, but didn't.

JW isn't exactly a reputable source. But it doesn't matter. You know why?

Because Bush DID win, he always had more votes, and he's in the White House (doing a great job, by the way).

Let's not fall into the liberal trap of quoting different or better sources of info for "who really won." We already know who won, and always have known: George W. Bush.

15 posted on 11/01/2001 9:18:10 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
What on earth would happen???

Nothing. The "consortium"'s count is not the official one.

16 posted on 11/01/2001 9:18:26 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Nothing. Florida law does not allow the votes to be counted by reporters and nincompoops. Besides that there are other laws (state and Federal) regarding the timing of the delivery of those "certified" results.

Additionally, the Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision told the Gorons that they had violated a law or two in their rush to discover Dim votes. And in that decision was also a few directives that for a vote to be a vote, the voter must have followed instructions.

Dims must love that wonderful liberal educational system.

17 posted on 11/01/2001 9:20:36 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: umbra
There is something I do not understand about this news. What "consortium"? What "recount data"?

The only "recount data" which is relevant to anything was the data from the...well....actual recount: the one which occurred within days after the election, as mandated by law, because the margin of victory was less than 1.5%.

Then of course there were the results of the partial hand recounts, which are designed to discover whether full hand recounts were warranted.

And all such "recount" data was required to be submitted to the Secretary of State's office within one week of Election Day, for certification. One county did indeed complete its full hand recount by the deadline, and was included in the final tally, which found Bush with a victory.

Those are the only "recounts" which matter, and they are over with.

So what is this "consortium" doing? (I looked at the link but it was uninformative...)

18 posted on 11/01/2001 9:20:48 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Anyone else agree it's time to move on? Bush is president and nothing is going to change that. By continually carping on this, liberals only look more and more ridiculous. Let them say whatever they want - it won't change the outcome.
19 posted on 11/01/2001 9:22:18 AM PST by jbemis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
What if this "consortium" announces that upon further review Algore actually won florida..... What on earth would happen???

Great indignation and calls for action on DU. Thunderous outrage on bartcop. Thoughtful pondering by the liberal media. A collective yawn from the rest of the country.

20 posted on 11/01/2001 9:22:32 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson