Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All eyes on Kabul's front line
Janes Defense Weekly ^ | 11/2/2001 | Anthony Davis

Posted on 11/02/2001 7:48:05 PM PST by scannell

All eyes on Kabul's front line

By Anthony Davis JDW Correspondent, Panshir Valley

As US airstrikes intensified across northern Afghanistan this week, Taliban front-line forces have for the first time been suffering serious losses, paving the way for ground operations by the opposition United Front (UF).

Airstrikes on 1 November hit Taliban forces on front lines near Keshendeh south of Mazar-e Sharif in what UF sources described as the heaviest day of bombing in the Mazar region to date. A B-52H strike also targeted the front line near the confluence of the Kokcha and the Amu Darya river, which marks the Afghan-Tajik border. Strikes throughout 2 November marked the heaviest bombing north of Kabul to date.

UF commanders have greeted the intensified bombing with satisfaction. "Compared to bombing in earlier days, these strikes [north of Kabul on 31 October] were particularly effective," Gen Abdul Nasir, an officer on the staff of UF Kabul theatre commander Gen Bismillah Khan, told JDW. "Enemy casualties were heavy and our information is that three tanks, 15 trucks and two artillery pieces were destroyed." Other sources added that in all 15 tanks had been destroyed on the Kabul front from 27-31 October.

UF Foreign Minister Dr Abdullah said if the intensified bombing were sustained at similar levels he believed the way would be opened for a breakthrough on any front "in a matter of days".

Over the past week the UF has continued preparations that aim to resupply and bring up to full strength brigades in the Kabul theatre. Five infantry brigades are currently committed to the front on the Old and New Road leading south to Kabul. Local irregulars support these regular forces. Independent estimates are that the UF has now deployed 6,000-8,000 troops in the Kabul theatre, or around half of the forces based in its northeastern stronghold. No reliable estimates are available for the Taliban but analysts believe that, given a reported influx of hundreds of fresh Pakistani volunteers, numbers could be between 7,000 and 10,000.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2001 7:48:05 PM PST by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scannell
7,000 to 10,000 new recruits who brought their own weapons. Yeah, that'll work. Sounds like as good a way as any to rid the world of the radicals.
2 posted on 11/02/2001 7:56:19 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scannell
On ITN tonight, the Brits had a reporter with the Northern Alliance boys. They were watching the bombing, and simultaneously talking to the Taliban boys being bombed. The lines are so far apart that the Taliban guys can duck out of their positions when the planes get close, let the bombs fall, and then run back. They all have been carpet bombed before. All they need is spotters on the next hill to tell them the planes are coming.

As for the Northern Alliance boys, they were saying they were not going forward until we put real troops in. (Not that Rangers aren't real, just that they are not very many of them in theatre).

3 posted on 11/02/2001 7:57:09 PM PST by Elihu Burritt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: scannell
"All eyes on Kabul's front line."

Now you see it, BOOM!!!now you don't

5 posted on 11/02/2001 8:00:15 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elihu Burritt
All they need is spotters on the next hill to tell them the planes are coming.

How do they perform that trick at night?

6 posted on 11/02/2001 8:01:00 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Elihu Burritt
Forget about this Northern Alliance. It's just a bunch of ragtag bands of men who are unemployed and have nothing else to do. It is really many alliances that don't really like each other so we need to forget about them and send in the appache gun ships and A10's and so some up close ass whipping on our own.
7 posted on 11/02/2001 8:01:06 PM PST by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scannell
Keep the Pakistani volunteers coming! They get Paradise, 72 Virgins, and 28 Boys! Everyone else gets Liberty and The World! I just love win-win situations!
8 posted on 11/02/2001 8:01:12 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elihu Burritt
But what were the NA men saying?
9 posted on 11/02/2001 8:02:17 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
7,000 to 10,000 new recruits who brought their own weapons.

"yo! abdul! you got any ammo for a spandau mauser?"

we should drop loads of t-shirts for 'em, maybe with the slogan, "stop a bullet for allah."

dep

10 posted on 11/02/2001 8:07:26 PM PST by dep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Here comes the Pakistani Pashtuns decked out in their moth-eaten turbans, tattered robes and stinky bedroom slippers to pillage what little remains in Trachcanistan.
11 posted on 11/02/2001 8:10:58 PM PST by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scannell
As US airstrikes intensified across northern Afghanistan this week...

I hear this every day. When do we reach full intensity?

12 posted on 11/02/2001 8:12:30 PM PST by Northpaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
I agree. All the do is whine, whine....We need more bombs, we need uniforms, we need guns, we need troops, we need food, etc. Sounds like they want the US to do everything and then they can just walk right in.
13 posted on 11/02/2001 8:13:58 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
Apache?



14 posted on 11/02/2001 8:16:59 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
How do they perform that trick at night?

Good question, but it's an easy answer. They hear the planes coming long before they see them. Afghanistan doesn't have a sky full of planes, and they can very effectively identify anything flying as ours.

Actually, the Brits and the Germans used these crude ground link systems in WWII. Very simple and effective. In WWI, they Allies used the same idea to give Paris warning whenever the Germans fired the Paris gun. In that case it was a telephone, but there was enough time to here 'incoming' and run into a hole because of the very high trajectory.

In a sense we are not really carpet bombing, as the planes are going in one by one. It's not so much a carpet as a hallway runner. Perhaps that will change.

15 posted on 11/02/2001 8:27:37 PM PST by Elihu Burritt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I agree. All the do is whine, whine....We need more bombs, we need uniforms, we need guns, we need troops, we need food, etc. Sounds like they want the US to do everything and then they can just walk right in.

The last time they were in control, we just split and left them in the lurch and they got hit hard. Seems as though they remember that.

16 posted on 11/02/2001 8:29:32 PM PST by Elihu Burritt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Local Weather Report

17 posted on 11/02/2001 8:29:55 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Elihu Burritt
The lines are so far apart that the Taliban guys can duck out of their positions when the planes get close, let the bombs fall, and then run back...

With Fuel-Air, they could run for cover...but not run back.

18 posted on 11/02/2001 8:45:20 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Damn, Shermy. Do you go by "Registered," too? Great work! :D

I find it ironic that we have to bomb the Taliban for weeks at a stretch before NA thinks the targets have been softened enough to move in on. Folks, I got two words for that kind of thinking: Monte Cassino.

If the NA don't get their rear in gear and move with what they've got immediately after the last rock bounces, they'll never unhinge the Taliban or find Ol' Slammy.
19 posted on 11/02/2001 8:51:43 PM PST by BradyLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
With Fuel-Air, they could run for cover...but not run back

The Russkies used a lot of those too. It's a big country, and the lines are very thin. I remember Rumsfeld once saying we weren't going to waste a Cruise missile to take out small targets, but that's all there is.

Infantry is still the Queen of the battlefield, and air power but her handmaiden.

20 posted on 11/02/2001 9:25:32 PM PST by Elihu Burritt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson