Reuters: Not "terrorism," but "holy war"

Media Research Center's Cyberalert ^ | November 6, 2001 | Brent Baker

[Mr. Mulliner]

Don't get riled. I interpreted your statement the same way GuillermoX did and at least one other person on this thread did too.

[MHGinTN]

You're a fine one to call someone's intellect into question, Maroon:

If you disagree with this premise than how do you describe the American Revolutionaries? post #7

then \"then\ adv 1 : at that time 2 : soon after that : NEXT 3 : in addition : BESIDES 4 : in that case 5 : CONSEQUENTLY © 1995 Zane Publishing, Inc. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary © 1994 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
than \"th€n, "than\ conj 1 — used after a comparative adjective or adverb to introduce the second part of a comparison expressing inequality 2 — used after other or a word of similar meaning to express a difference of kind, manner, or identity © 1995 Zane Publishing, Inc. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary © 1994 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated

[MHGinTN]

I'd say you should walk the plank, but the tea is probably still floating in the Boston Harbor, so you'd end up running away! LOL

[wwjdn]

I think that we should stop referring to them as "jouralists" and start calling them by their proper name....Fabricators. These "professionals" take stories that are important and shove them to page 3456 and "elaborate" (a fancy word for outright lie) on a story that the corporation wants publicized.

CNN is a prime example, see other posts on the CNN stories.

Thanks God that there are still a few "honest" reporters left, but they are fading fast.

[MHGinTN]

Sorry, I'm not into 'see' food. Bwahahaha