Notice how the indirect approach was used in the above sentence so as not to call attention to any specific writer, a gallingly silly practice because the reason the post was written was to call attention to a certain person's personal observations of the use of the personal pronoun by Clinton and Bush. Please note that this was done at the specific request of another FReeper. It is not something that would have been done as a separate post on the writer's own without being asked. Since the post called for the personal observations of the writer, one might be more forgiving about the issue ... especially considering the reason for each "speech": Clinton addressing his alma mater on the terrorist attacks and turning it into a Hallelujah chorus to himself; Bush speaking to the United Nations on terrorism and the American response; and a certain FReeper's personal observations, analysis, and conclusions about both.