Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
It's not as radical a conclusion as you think. Hitler was elected and the Nazi's enjoyed widespread public support right up until the very end.
15 posted on 11/12/2001 9:33:32 AM PST by Entelechy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Entelechy
It's not as radical a conclusion as you think. Hitler was elected and the Nazi's enjoyed widespread public support right up until the very end.

The Soviet Union held elections as well. The point is, when Hitler became chancellor there was no Nazi Germany, no fascist state - he created those over time, and the elections became more and more meaningless. And even if you want to continue to split hairs to keep that point, what of Japan and Germany under the Kaiser? Those were monarchies and they started major wars. The whole premise that democracy leads to large-scale war is one of the more idiotic ones I have seen in some time. If you want a good analysis of the demographic and economic factors that created the major wars of the 20th century, I suggest reading the beginning of Barbara Tuchmans The Guns of August.

17 posted on 11/12/2001 9:37:46 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson