Skip to comments.
Moon mining: want to invest in the final frontier?
Reuters ^
| 21 NOV 2001 23:30
| Jeremy Smith
Posted on 11/21/2001 8:23:23 PM PST by CommiesOut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: CommiesOut
Question: If tons and tons and tons of minerals and ore were mined from the moon and removed to Earth, wouldn't it alter the moon's orbit over time?
To: Clara Lou
If tons and tons and tons of minerals and ore were mined from the moon and removed to Earth, wouldn't it alter the moon's orbit over time?No.
To: Clara Lou
I'd be happy if they figure out first what to do with terrorists and why they hate us.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Cool! (Why not?)
To: CommiesOut
For some reason this story is based on the eroneous assumption that the minerals listed are in short supply on earth. Not so...just look at commodity prices for copper, tungsten, gold, etc. There are PLENTY of reserves right here on earth of every commodity listed.
If anyone thinks this is a worthy investment, please call me first...I have some diamond claims in southern Nevada that we should talk about!!
To: CommiesOut
For some reason this story is based on the eroneous assumption that the minerals listed are in short supply on earth. Not so...just look at commodity prices for copper, tungsten, gold, etc. There are PLENTY of reserves right here on earth of every commodity listed.
If anyone thinks this is a worthy investment, please call me first...I have some diamond claims in southern Nevada that we should talk about!!
To: brityank
A mineral deposit becomes an ore when the mineral can be mined, recovered and refined in an economical fashion.
28
posted on
11/25/2001 6:51:12 AM PST
by
monocle
To: CommiesOut
Mining for the sake of mining is a losing proposition. Mining for the sake of building hotels, large solar cell farms etc. would work. It's a catch-22. We won't build those things on the moon because there is no demand for it. There is no demand for it because there's noone there that needs it. There's noone there because there's no hotels etc. on the surface.
One way to break this catch-22 is to start up a lunar hotel. The only way a lunar hotel will be profitable will be with much cheaper launch costs. The Russians already launch payloads into orbit for about $600/lb. This is sufficient to enable construction of a hotel and maintain a potential profit.
Because of various laws, we'll have to wait until a private American or European launch company can offer launch costs in this range. I think there will be several companies that will achieve sub-$1000/lb. launch costs within 5 years.
NASA has no interest in such activities so they will not be involved, but that's a good thing. We can't afford a $100 billion lunar base that would keep out civilians. You build a colony/city with NON astronauts.
29
posted on
11/25/2001 1:25:46 PM PST
by
Brett66
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson