To: eno_
A multi-fuel/flexible-fuel engine would be revolutionary, especially if it could run on water. Even if it got 1 mpg that would be far cheaper than gasoline and it wouldn't even require a refined product. If you ran out of fuel you wouldn't need anything but a pond to refuel. I still don't understand the hype over the scooter part unless it was a poorly written article by a technically illiterate journalist that didn't understand the implications of the power source.
18 posted on
11/30/2001 6:55:56 AM PST by
Brett66
To: Brett66
No, that's the whole thing: No free lunch. It cannot be fueled by water. You need a source of electric power to extract hydrogen from water. But if you could ferment your grass clippings and make fuel, now you have something. External combustion, like a Sterling engine, can use "junk" fuel, like unrefined biomass. That would be cheap and diffuse enough to change energy economics. Imagine China and India with near-first-world mobility for the people, but without increasing demand for oil. If you wanted to use it in an enclosed space, you would have to go for a completely clean fuel like hydrogen. But that is more for the wheelchair than for this scooter.
19 posted on
11/30/2001 7:05:10 AM PST by
eno_
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson