Let's see, Enron's upper management and major shareholders were crooks, and California's socialist energy scheme collapsed.
Your hero Clinton was on the watch while Enron's management was playing number games to rip off it's other shareholders, why doesn't he get any credit?
I have actually seen other examples of this: Companies doing great under Clinton because they could cook the books all they wanted and get away with it, but when Bush took charge all the shenanigans had to stop.
I wonder how much of the miracle economy was due to just that kind of game and how much the current recession is just the chickens coming home to roost.
Did I ever say different?