It never fails to amuze me utterly how some people here will throw in the most asinine non sequitur to try to associate something they disapprove of (drugs) with something that every sane person would disapprove of (child molestation). When someone has to resort to this kind of specious nexus, it's apparent that they have no credibility and no merit to their own argument.
Sexual exploitation of children is no different from exposing them to hashish/heroin fumes in the home.
Respectfully, sir/madam, there is no similarity whatsoever and you do a grave injustice to the victims of child sexual abuse to say there is. Beyond that ill twist of logic, I would presume that most people who may be doing drugs are doing it out of the view of their children, rather than grabbing them by the throat and blowing the smoke in their faces.
Enough with the Reefer Madness nonsense.
What!? Reefer Madness isn't the truth? How can that be? Wasn't it put out by the all-mighty, all-knowing gubmint? That means it must be true!