[RLK]

Substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" and you can use the same narrow-minded arguments to scare people into giving up their 2nd Amendment liberties.

------------------------

As an individual with an IQ above room temperatue I wouldn't substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" because guns are not drugs.

[ravinson]

As an individual with an IQ above room temperatue I wouldn't substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" because guns are not drugs.

It must be awfully cold in your room.

[michaelje]

"As an individual with an IQ above room temperatue I wouldn't substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" because guns are not drugs. "

Thats not the point.

[NC_Libertarian]

As an individual with an IQ above room temperatue I wouldn't substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" because guns are not drugs.

They are both morally neutral inanimate things that are demonized for political and financial gain. It takes a human to do something immoral or moral with a gun or a drug. Criminalize people!

I would say that it is far more important to protect the right to bear arms, the right that guarantees that I'll be smokeing a joint this weekend or die.

[LazarusX]

As an individual with an IQ above room temperatue I wouldn't substitute the word "guns" for "drugs" because guns are not drugs.

right. Guns are made to kill. drugs to give pleasure. There's a huge difference. Personally I don't think either should be banned.

[Basil314]

You can't tell me what I can and can't do. Your head is so far in the sand.