Posted on 12/06/2001 4:13:59 AM PST by Ammiel W.
Hahahaha!! I think YOU need to take your own advice!
You mean like in Saudi Arabia and all other Muslim countries?
fictions like bible(old/new), koran etc... then there are all sorts of holy lands
for example Kansas is holy land for W.O.Oz sect
otherewise
there is no such thing as holy land
Irrelevant because Madaba map is of C6 Jerusalem and Temple Mount Church of St. Mary was late C3 - over 200 years earlier.
El Aksa allegedly built 20 years after Dome of Rock yet entirely different construction. Dome of Rock has wood framework with tiled facade - El Aksa is all stone beause it had already been there as a Church when the Muslims conquered Jerusalem and probably someting else again (storehouse or granery) previously during Roman period.
Why do you think the Muslims picked the Temple Mount to build their third holiest site if it had not been considered a sacred site for well over 2000 years beforehand.
The first Temple ("Solomon's") was destroyed a thousand years earlier. What point you are trying to make?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.