There is absolutely no "domestic need, economic or otherwise" served by America's underwriting of this country. None.
George Washington was the "father" of America and he did enunciate a crystal-clear foreign policy. He did not defer giving foreign policy advice for someone more "learned" on the subject than him, like, say, Marc Rich, Jonathan Pollard, or yourself. George Washington's foreign policy advice is: Mind your own business, and don't be a "slave" for loving another country too much or hating another country too much. By taking sides in humanity's longest-running tribal war we are going against the First President's explicit foreign policy advice. Those who go against this advice are the ones who are "anti-American." You want to hijack this country the same way Al-Quiada has taken over Afghanistan, only with far more subtlety and success.
The U.S. never served Israel except in the fictitious minds of Islam firsters like you
"Serve" is defined in the English language, as "to be of use."
Every time America vetoes a Seccurity Council resolution, or otherwise uses its political and economic influence to prevent actions taken against this state, it is "serving" ["being of use to"] this country. It further "serves" Israel ["being useful to"]by providing weapons, underwriting its civilian economy so it can produce even more weapons, and turning a blind eye towards any injustices the regime perpetrates even when they directly conflict with explicit American principles, and even American laws.
It's a democracy and a source of intelligence in this area. Good enough for most Americans.
George Washington was the "father" of America and he did enunciate a crystal-clear foreign policy. He did not defer giving foreign policy advice for someone more "learned" on the subject than him, like, say, Marc Rich, Jonathan Pollard, or yourself. George Washington's foreign policy advice is: Mind your own business, and don't be a "slave" for loving another country too
All given with your simplistic and incoherent understanding of the growth of the U.S. internationally.
Every time America vetoes a Seccurity Council resolution, or otherwise uses its political and economic influence to prevent actions taken against this state, it is "serving" ["being of use to"] this country.
The U.S. vetoes lame-brained resolutions from your hero-club the U.N. Big deal.
and turning a blind eye towards any injustices the regime perpetrates even when they directly conflict with explicit American principles, and even American laws.
Sounds like the U.S.'s relationship to the Saudi dictatorship. No Israel issue here.