Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
What were you or he asserting there?

He related "Open Door" to immigration issues in the middle of the nineteenth century. I too am going from memory but I think I'm clear about this issue. Maybe I'll have to check. But the Open Door Notes which I am speaking about leading eventually to the framing of American economic expansionism, principally being the notion of free competition with respect to trade and certain guarantees with respect to the territorial integrity of the trading nation - in this case it began as China. The Notes created the policy framework for economic expansionism. This was a late 19th century process as I noted above.

236 posted on 12/11/2001 8:45:59 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]


To: Lent
Well, as for free trade, I think we rode on the backs of Britain, that was also pro free trade by and large. Coincidence of interests there. The immigration thing baffles me, because except for racism against Asians, which created a practical constaint, there were no immigration laws until 1924 that I know of.
237 posted on 12/11/2001 8:55:29 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

To: Lent
Come to think about it, Britain was more pro free trade than the US, at least when the GOP was in power. McKinley liked tariffs, Cleveland didn't.
238 posted on 12/11/2001 8:57:57 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson