Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin
Taken from the article you cite:

The pet project of Commerce Committee Chariman Rep. Billy Tauzin, this bill, as pointed out often on this site, would remove the big carrot of long distance service dangled before the Bell monopolies by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to get them to open their local networks to competition.

This Bill does not remove any of the obligations imposed on the Bells by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 regarding opening of their local oops to permit competition in the provision of voice telephone exchange.

It prohibits any Bell company from marketing, billing or collecting for voice interLATA telephone service delivered over high speed, packet switching networks until the Bell company is authorized by the FCC to enter the long distance voice market.

49 posted on 12/11/2001 1:56:21 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: farmfriend
Instead of posting one line, why not post the entire article? I urge you to investigate this issue further.

Can you define the difference between a monopoly(Ma Bell) and an oligopoly(Baby Bells).

53 posted on 12/11/2001 2:20:16 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson