Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Northrop Grumman pitches 30,000 lb "Big BLU" (my title)
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 12/14/2001 6:27:18 PM PST by Husker24

Northrop Grumman Pitches 30,000-Pound Guided Bomb To Air Force Fri Dec 14 2001 10:40:25 ET Northrop Grumman has briefed Air Force officials on a concept to field a 30,000-pound guided weapon, called 'Big BLU,' that could be used as a penetrator to destroy hardened targets that may house enemy leaders or weapons of mass destruction, DEFENSE DAILY reported on Friday. The proposal may gain favor with the Pentagon as the military tries to kill Al-Qaeda leaders holed up in Afghan caves. An Air Force official said, however, that the weapon will have significant cost and schedule hurdles associated with aircraft integration, is only a concept and is not envisioned for use during the Afghan conflict.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 12/14/2001 6:27:18 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Id hate to be within a mile of that monster when it goes off.
2 posted on 12/14/2001 6:28:36 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
It'll probably be ready for Iraq.
3 posted on 12/14/2001 6:30:01 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
30,000!?!

That is one Big Bomb...

4 posted on 12/14/2001 6:33:25 PM PST by cascademountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
How're they gonna deliver it? The tooling doesn't exist to manufacture the first 2 stages of the
Saturn V anymore! :-)
5 posted on 12/14/2001 6:34:05 PM PST by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Old news. This has been going on since the opening salvos of this conflict. A C5 will deliver the goods.
6 posted on 12/14/2001 6:35:45 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgan's Raider
Drudge has a developing after the story, so there will be a little more to it.
7 posted on 12/14/2001 6:36:33 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgan's Raider
Good point. The present BLU can only be effectively delivered if the skies are clear and there isn't a risk of AA fire or missles.
8 posted on 12/14/2001 6:36:54 PM PST by zandtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zandtar
Id still like to see one go off.....from a distance, about 5 miles.
9 posted on 12/14/2001 6:38:00 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cascademountaineer
30,000!?!

That is one Big Bomb...

Or if you're a Brit, one cheap one.

10 posted on 12/14/2001 6:38:24 PM PST by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Ayh why not?

Buy it!

11 posted on 12/14/2001 6:40:23 PM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Ayh why not? Buy it!

Aye, and it'll sure blow the creases out of their knickers.

12 posted on 12/14/2001 6:42:24 PM PST by P8riot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
This is interesting in that the physical devestation caused probably is equal to the earliest atomic bombs [TNT equiv]...

But to even consider a tactical nuke of the same size of this proposed big blu would be out of the question...

13 posted on 12/14/2001 6:48:54 PM PST by XpandTheEkonomy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XpandTheEkonomy
Well, I think the after-effects of a Big Blu will be a good deal less to worry about than those of a tactical nuke. ;-)

Gamma

14 posted on 12/14/2001 6:54:05 PM PST by Gamma-131-I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
The effective distance only grows as the 3d root of the weight. Many smaller bombs are a more effective approach, pound for pound. The terror value would be great, however.
15 posted on 12/14/2001 6:55:12 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: XpandTheEkonomy
15 tons is not equal to 30 kilotons by a bunch.

Kiloton:
NOUN: abbr. kt 1. A unit of weight or capacity equal to 1,000 metric tons. 2. An explosive force equivalent to that of 1,000 metric tons of TNT.

18 posted on 12/14/2001 7:06:06 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Northrop Grumman pitches 30,000 lb "Big BLU"

They didn't pitch it very far. 15 tons is pretty heavy for even a Marine. It'll never make it as a grenade.

/john

19 posted on 12/14/2001 7:09:17 PM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson