You have unwittingly stumbled upon the great basic truth of the evolution debate. The fact is that evolutionism with its requirement for an esssentially infinite sequence of zero-probability events is basically stupider than any doctrine or religion which had ever previously been devised. Literally ANYTHING, the Popul Vuh, Shamanism, Rastifari, Voodoo, the doctrine of the Great Punpkin and Pumpkinism, anything at all makes vastly more sense than evolution does. You could even devise a new religion by taking the single stupidest doctrine from each of the existing religions, and even that would be perfectly logical and intelligent compared to evolution.
Face it: Chuck Darwin was the stupidest white man who ever lived.
The dialectic is not between evolution and religion as the evos would have us believe: the dialectic is between evolution and modern mathematics. In order to believe in evolution, you have to take everything we know about modern mathematics, probability theory, and logic, and throw them all in the toilet. Personally, I'd rather flush evolution down the toilet of dead ideological doctrines and keep modern mathematics. Mathematics produces things like computers and automobiles; Darwinism produces things like naziism and communism.
Why do you feel the need to qualify this by bringing up his race?