Israeli army says no action on wounded reporters

Reuters | 12/19/01

[a_witness]

I suppose, but the French in my family married the Huron indians in my family, so technically, we go way back.

God gave the land of Canaan to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and their descendants forever.

[a_witness]

Have you ever shot at the IDF, or have you spoken with people that have shot at the IDF (bombs count too) ?***

No, I've never shot at the IDF.

You did not answer the other part of my question.
1. Have you spoken with people who have shot at the IDF ?
2. or shot/bombed Israel (including the so-called Occupied Territories) ?

[Romulus]

The IDF, like the American military, has rules of engagement.

How nice for them.

Trying to film terrorists in action could qualify as willful ignorance, ...

I reckon it's the IDF that objects to being filmed, don't you? Bad for morale and all.

I would think it easy to mistake them for terrorists.

Any stick -- or schtick -- is good enough to beat a dog.

[veronica]

I'm in Detroit and saw it on the Canadian TV. I doubt they will show it here in the U.S. because it's too incriminating of the IDF.

You are so full of baloney. You are always citing sources that nobody else sees or has heard of. Laughable!

[veronica]

'Course ONE reporter who we KNOW was abused - is Robert Fisk.

In his case, he was beaten to a pulp by a gang of Muslims. But don't shed any tears for him. He enjoyed it. 'Rough trade'.

LOL.

[a_witness]

How nice for them.

As opposed to the rules of engagement practiced by the Islamic terrorists you are here to support

I reckon it's the IDF that objects to being filmed, don't you? Bad for morale and all.

Sticks and stones, bullets, mortar fire and suicide bombers can really spoil an otherwise good day.

Any stick -- or schtick -- is good enough to beat a dog.

Both Israel and the United States have a big stick to beat this particular dog.

[a_witness]

No wiggle room for you here.

Why can't you honestly answer the questions I posed about your contacts with those who perpetrate violence against Israel ?

[Romulus]

...the Islamic terrorists you are here to support

There's that schtick again.

(Attempted intimidation via false accusation is a form of terrorism, BTW.)

[a_witness]

Okay, you are here to support the Islamic terrorist journalists

[a_witness]

But weren't you talking with Hizbollah while Israel was fighting a war against Islamic terrorists ?

Why on earth would you want to do that ?

[a_witness]

I take neither you nor Veronica have any indication of how ridiculous you both sound.

While you, OTOH, don't really understand how angry most Americans are at Islamic terrorists and their supporters because they murdered thousands, and want to murder millions of our citizens. Instead you populate FR with hundreds, nay thousands, of comments that consisting take the side of Islamic terrorists (AKA Palestinians). Now why is that ? Is it liberalism ?

[a_witness]

We're discussing the IDF investigation, or should I say non-investigation. That's what I'm going to talk about. Not this other nonsense.

Did you consider yourself a journalist when you were consorting with our enemies ?

[a_witness]

Did you ever yourself a journalist ?

[Romulus]

the Islamic terrorist journalists

Journalists are terrorists? In what way does gathering news equate with terrorism?

Oh...maybe you mean only Islamic journalists are terrorists. Beg your pardon; I see what you mean. So their real offense is not newsgathering, but being Islamic. Why didn't you say so?

[McGavin999]

I hope that you understand that "journalists" are one of the most despised professions in the world. People don't like them because of their dishonesty and their tendency to outright lie in order to advance their own agenda. I seriously doubt anyone will be believe any "proof" furnished by journalists.