Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jet crash linked to a failure in the tail [AA Flight 587]
Newark Star Ledger ^ | 12/19/01 | TED SHERMAN

Posted on 12/19/2001 7:23:07 AM PST by Incorrigible




 

Jet crash linked to a failure in the tail

12/19/01

BY TED SHERMAN
STAR-LEDGER STAFF
 

[New York, NY] -- The tail control surfaces of the doomed American Airlines Airbus A300 that crashed in New York last month malfunctioned during a routine preflight check, investigators revealed yesterday.

While they said the problem apparently had been resolved by resetting a computer, a similar American Airlines Airbus was grounded in Lima, Peru, earlier this month after pilots reported the plane had begun "fishtailing" shortly after takeoff.

Meanwhile, the European manufacturer of the passenger jet is refurbishing a simulator to examine possible malfunction scenarios within the rudder system of the aircraft, according to the National Transportation Safety Board, which is heading the investigation into the Nov. 12 crash of Flight 587.

WAKE TURBULENCE

The American Airlines Airbus bound for the Dominican Republic went out of control just minutes after takeoff from John F. Kennedy International Airport, as it flew in the turbulent wake of a much larger Boeing 747 jumbo jet.

Much attention has been focused on the tail and vertical fin of the jet -- made of light-weight, carbon-reinforced plastic composite panels. The recovered wreckage shows the fin separated cleanly from the fuselage as if cut by a knife, just before the plane spiraled down, killing all 260 passengers and crew. Five people on the ground also were killed.

The Airbus made wide use of composite structures throughout its airframe -- materials widely used in military aircraft but only recently being used to replace metal and alloys in commercial jets. Since the accident, U.S. and French aviation authorities called for the visual inspection of every Airbus A300 in operation, amid growing concerns of a major design flaw.

To date, no inspection has turned up anything unusual, but United Airlines -- which employs a more rigorous ultrasound inspection of its Airbus fleet -- said last week it discovered a tiny flaw in the vertical fin of an Airbus A320's tail section. The airline found a small separation in the carbon fiber, but believed the problem was "insignificant," and returned the plane to service without repair.

The rudder controls of Flight 587 also have loomed large in the investigation. According to the black box data from the plane, the rudder made five large swings just after it passed through the wake vortex of the 747, and before the aircraft began to break up. According to the NTSB, a review of Flight 587's maintenance log shows that on the morning of the accident, a pitch trim control and the yaw damper would not engage during a pre-flight check.

The yaw damper moves the rudder in small increments to keep the plane stable so it flies straight ahead. The pitch trim control helps move the plane up or down.

The maintenance log showed that the computer controlling those components was reset by a mechanic, which resolved the problem, and NTSB investigators found there were no other maintenance items noted regarding the vertical stabilizer or rudder system when the aircraft took off.

After the incident in Lima this month, mechanics there replaced the aircraft's yaw damper actuator.

SAVING THE PIECES

Most of the wreckage of Flight 587 is now in containers at a storage facility in Harrison, N.J. The tail section was delivered to NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., the week of Dec. 3 and is undergoing nondestructive inspection -- including ultrasound, tap-testing and photography using heat-sensitive film.

The NTSB also is looking into the aircraft's auxiliary power unit, a small jet engine used to provide power for aircraft systems while on the ground and also for emergency electrical backup during flight. The unit is located in the tail of the aircraft and tests are being conducted to determine how much of its heat may be directed onto the vertical stabilizer.

"We're trying to come up with the right testing protocols," NTSB spokesman Ted Lopatkiewicz said of the ongoing investigation. "At this point we're eager to see what we can learn from those tests."

Not for commercial use.  For educational and discussion purposes only.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaflight587
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
I'm fairly convinced this crash was due to a combination of shoddy manufacturing combined with unusual turbulance factors.

Others may disagree.

1 posted on 12/19/2001 7:23:07 AM PST by Incorrigible (nospam@please.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *AA Flight 587; AA Flight 587
Bump to the lists.

Fore more articles on Flight 587 click *AA Flight 587 or AA Flight 587

To see a complete list of bump topics: Free Republic Bump List Register

2 posted on 12/19/2001 7:25:27 AM PST by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I don't disagree, due to the fact that the NTSB is being allowed to investigate this one, and the FBI isn't cutting them out like with TWA800.
3 posted on 12/19/2001 7:27:43 AM PST by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Just goes to show that most of mankind's problems can be traced to defective piece 'o tail!
4 posted on 12/19/2001 7:29:14 AM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
None of the information coming out of this investigation can be trusted. Witnesses reported two explosions which I do not see mentioned in any of the explanations. It's being conducted by the same corrupt organizations that covered up the true cause of Flt.800 (wherein HUNDREDS of reliable witness reported seeing a missile strike). Personally, I do not take anything that comes from federal agencies at face value, and I certainly never assume that the mainstream liberal communist press is reporting the truth.
5 posted on 12/19/2001 7:32:43 AM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
At the risk of being labeled as a wearer of a tin-foil hat, I have to ask this; if this was just a malfunction, then why haven't they released the tape from the surveilance camera that was reported to have gotten some images of the incident?
6 posted on 12/19/2001 7:47:02 AM PST by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Cover-ups are not uncommon. TWA 800 is not the first. The Arrow Air flight in Gander stinks to high heaven. Egyptair 900 (with a large number of senior Egyptian officers on board) was a "mystery" until 9/11 when it became clear that Al-Quaida does recruit suicide hijackers. It almost seems as if there is a policy regarding Mideast-related air disasters that any hint of sabotage/terrorism must be hushed up. And, of course, the airlines now say they will blow the deadline to bomb-screen luggage.
7 posted on 12/19/2001 7:47:07 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Yes, you are right about the Egypt Air flight. It is obvious to me that the pilot crashed the plane. I personally do not believe flying is any safer today than it was on 9/11. I don't care what the talking heads say - the media is in cahoots with the government on these cover-ups in that the just readily accept the most cockamamie explanations with no questions asked, e.g. the 1000 ft. rocket-like climb of TWA#800 after the nose fell off (a physical impossibility).
8 posted on 12/19/2001 7:55:32 AM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Egyptair 900 (with a large number of senior Egyptian officers on board) was a "mystery" until 9/11 when it became clear that Al-Quaida does recruit suicide hijackers

What rock have you been living under? According to NTSB the pilot suicidally deliberately crashed the plane. This has been stated publicly, and well before 9/11. Only people in denial are the Egyptians. There's no "Mystery" at all.

9 posted on 12/19/2001 10:32:21 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John H K
First of all, you replied to the wrong person - the post you responded to was not mine. Second of all, I think you should read my posts again. Where did you get your glasses?
10 posted on 12/19/2001 10:45:11 AM PST by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eno_
And, of course, the airlines now say they will blow the deadline to bomb-screen luggage.

Meeting the deadline was impossible from day one. You can't screen luggage for bombs with machinery that hasn't been manufactured, can you?

11 posted on 12/19/2001 10:52:10 AM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Wasn't there a lady that said she saw a fire in the "armpit" of the wing, before an explosion?
Wasn't that before the tail fell off?
12 posted on 12/19/2001 11:04:19 AM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Wasn't there a lady that said she saw a fire in the "armpit" of the wing, before an explosion?

Don't you just hate those pesky little details? *smile*

13 posted on 12/19/2001 11:40:05 AM PST by LaineyDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
El Al did it for decades with no fancy machines.
14 posted on 12/19/2001 12:16:39 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Evening Bump
15 posted on 12/19/2001 2:00:58 PM PST by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: eno_
Good for El Al. They have a teeny tiny number of flights that take place from a teeny tiny number of airports in comparison to what we have.
18 posted on 12/19/2001 3:01:29 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Seriously, why should we expect less from airlines in the U.S.? McD's sells a tiny number of hamburgers in Israel, too, and somehow they find enough people to cook a lot more burgers over here. Searching luggage is not rocket science. Airlines are greedy and lazy, and should go bankrupt becuase they can't get off their fat asses and make the paying customer safer.
19 posted on 12/19/2001 5:38:31 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Do you not agree it is impossible for them to deploy equipment that is not available? Do you not agree that it is impossible to hand-check every single piece of luggage and actually have any flights take place?
20 posted on 12/20/2001 2:45:38 AM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson