Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Is Pro-Baby: Mel Gibson And Fatherhood Against Abortion
Toogood Reports ^ | December 19, 2001 | Isaiah Flair

Posted on 12/19/2001 12:19:27 PM PST by Starmaker

"Feminists don't like me and I don't like them...I don't know why feminists have it out for me, but that's their problem, not mine." – Mel Gibson (star of Braveheart, The Patriot, Lethal Weapon; 100% pro-life)

"It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." – Mother Teresa

"I am dedicated to spending the rest of my life undoing the law that bears my name. I would like nothing more than to have this law overturned." – Norma L. McCorvey ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade)

"Thou shalt not kill" – The Holy Bible

"The decision nullifies a law, expressing the will of the people of Nebraska, that medical procedures must be governed by moral principles having their foundation in the intrinsic value of human life, including life of the unborn." – Justice Anthony Kennedy (dissent from Carhart vs. Stenberg, the 2000 case in which five other justices overturned a Nebraska law against partial-birth abortion, the procedure Justice Kennedy references)

"The inalienable right to life is found not only in the Declaration of Independence but also in the Constitution that every President is sworn to preserve, protect and defend.ÿ Both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life without due process of law." – Ronald Reagan

"Each of us has a unique beginning, the moment of conception..." – Jerome Lejeune (Nobel Prize, Genetics)

"A Person is a Person, no matter how Small." – Dr. Seuss

As a pro-lifer, I have to acknowledge that not only does a prenatal baby's life begin at conception, but that there begins fatherhood also. It is at conception that the father and mother are conjoined to produce new life. It is at conception that the most beautiful thing on the planet, the G-d-blessed spark of innocent human life, begins it's journey through existence.

From that moment, every good father loves his baby, and is moved by a need to protect, defend, and care for her from that moment, through all the days of her life. This empathy, this compassion and emotional investment, is a society builder. It is what gives fathers the motivation to work, to build homes, and to make the world a safer place.

It must be sanctioned and endorsed by every legal vehicle possible.

And it is time to define, for once and for all, what "pro-life" is.

Pro-Life is Pro-Baby. It is the understanding that babies have rights, rights worth protecting.

Every baby has a right to grow old enough to...

...gurgle, and smile, and laugh, and do all the silly, adorable things that babies do...

...take those first, halting steps as toddlers do, more waddling than walking, offering heart-melting toothless grins in celebration of their own efforts...

...see a bird, or a tree, or a cloud for the first time, and in wide-eyed wonder, point chubby fingers at each new wonder of Creation, as they discover them...

...know the joy of being protected from all the dangers of the outside world, by someone who loves them more than anything in the world...

This and more, babies deserve.

And the very human life of every innocent, vulnerable, defenseless little pre-natal baby begins with the moment of conception.

Prior to conception, each of the parent's respective haploid gametes contains twenty-three chromosomes, only half of what is required to create new human life. Conception results in a single cell which contains forty-six chromosomes.

These forty-six chromosomes are not only human, but are in a combination distinctly, undeniably different from either parent.

This combination is the blueprint for every biological aspect of the new human's life, and will determine infinite characteristics of the new individual. We all began our unique and valuable lives exactly this way. It is at this point that the processes of life are set in motion. Were they not, there would be nothing to terminate...

Dependency is a quality that extends well into toddlerhood. At conception, the new human life is at once dependent, and defenseless, and utterly vulnerable.

This is science.

This is reality.

It is indisputable.

The anti-baby ice-cold euphemism of "choice" defies science and nature no less than it controverts human decency and morals.

In the name of nature and science, we must recognize the reality that each of our unique human lives begins at conception.

In the name of human decency and morals, the very human life of every defenseless, innocent, vulnerable little prenatal baby must be fully protected.

Legally.

Roe vs. Wade will be overturned during this presidency, given two more United States Supreme Court appointments by very pro-life President George W. Bush.

When that occurs over the next three years, the road will be paved to the enactment of a protective law, reading as follows:

"Where the mother's life is not in danger, the father of every baby consensually conceived shall have the legal right to prevent the abortion of his baby, from the point of conception through birth, provided that he is willing to support and raise the baby."

It is the right thing to do.

Since this essay began with quotes I agree with, I will close it with a quote I do not agree with, but which eerily echoes the position of those on the other side of this issue:

"It had nothing to do with humanity, it couldn't have; it was a mass..." – a reference to the Holocaust by Franz Stangl, Nazi commandant of extermination camps in Sobibor (March, 1942 -September, 1942) and Treblinka (September, 1942 - August, 1943).

Interviewed by Gitta Sereny in 1970, Stangl's comments later appeared in the book Into That Darkness: An Examination of Conscience (1983).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; christianlist; culturewar; fatherhood; feministwatch; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-170 next last
To: sayfer bullets
There can be no rationalization for the killing of innocent life. Period.

This is true.

81 posted on 12/19/2001 5:53:15 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: EmmaPeel
I don't know you. You could be lying. Or your friend could be lying. But I doubt it. People here demanding photos or signed affidavits, well, if that's what it takes for them to believe it, fine. Of course the reality is (duh!) that you're not going to be able to furnish proof like that. They can think that means that it isn't so. It doesn't, of course. There's plenty of men out there who just compartmentalize these things. They really believe what their wives and family don't know doesn't hurt them. I know several guys like that, guys who by and large are really nice guys, and moral and ethical about most things in their life. But they consider extramarital sex to be separate and apart from the rest of their life. So, I just wanted to say, I support you, and I'm sorry to hear about your friend's experience.
82 posted on 12/19/2001 5:53:34 PM PST by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: StewartSmith
Here's another one:

"If you don't like abortion, don't be aborted!"

Tell that to the baby as her arms and legs are torn from her.

"If you don't like abortions, don't have your own baby aborted!"

Tell that to fathers.

83 posted on 12/19/2001 5:57:25 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
Killers are killers. It's just that simple.
84 posted on 12/19/2001 6:01:23 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Concentrate
I agree. And every path to saving innocent life must be endorsed. Else, we fail.
85 posted on 12/19/2001 6:03:53 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sayfer bullets
Emotion or loss of composure may occur, but it would be intellectually dishonest to assign this tendency to only one side of the argument.

You are certainly right about that. The hard core of both sides of issue are equally emotional.

The issue here is which side will have enough political savy to make civil law concur with their side.

86 posted on 12/19/2001 6:19:30 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

To: StewartSmith
See #83.
88 posted on 12/19/2001 6:34:06 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: StewartSmith
When each unique life begins is argued. Genetically, conception makes the most sense by far.

In any case, why do you choose to err on the side of death?

89 posted on 12/19/2001 6:37:43 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: pcl
Which is why the pro-life movement must specifically counter-weight each pro-abort argument.
91 posted on 12/19/2001 6:40:01 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

Comment #92 Removed by Moderator

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
Which is why the pro-life movement must specifically counter-weight each pro-abort argument.

If that is what you think it takes to get civil law to meet your goals, go for it. As a matter of fact, I highly encourage you to keep on thinking that way. :-)

94 posted on 12/19/2001 6:46:54 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Tabitha Soren
Any comments on the pro-abort position that you'd like to post?
95 posted on 12/19/2001 6:47:00 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
The State will never have the power to coerce abortions, nor should they.
They probably used to think that way in China, too...........
99 posted on 12/19/2001 6:54:40 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: StewartSmith;Tabitha Soren;proud2brc
The argument that pro-lifers don't care about born babies is just false.
100 posted on 12/19/2001 6:56:49 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson