[jennyp]

First, I am not a Creationist. I am however, quite intrigued by your desire to cast me as one. What are you hoping to accomplish by this repetative behavior?

Second, there is no evidence of a transitional form of any kind.

Interesting... You're emphatically NOT a creationist, yet you, against all evidence, emphatically claim there are NO transitional forms.

OK, so tell us: What DO you believe, exactly?

[D-fendr]

Where matter is favorable, life emerges.

You could describe how this occurs, like you can describe how lightning occurs, but it cannot be fully known using material alone.

Materialism, scientific or otherwise, is a subset of reality.

[Exnihilo]

OK, so tell us: What DO you believe, exactly?

I believe that natural evolution is incapable of generating specified complexity as found in biological life. There is absolutely ZERO scientific basis for believing otherwise. Materialists ASSUME that it is capable of this because it MUST be since they assume materialism a priori. That fossils exist, that fossils are of greater complexity higher in the strata is not what is at debate. What is at debate is HOW this increase in biological complexity came about. I believe that it could NOT have come about naturally and that it is the result of INTELLIGENT DESIGN, in whatever way said intelligence does the designing. Please, for the love of god, go buy a book on ID and read it.