Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
Come on. It's Hilliary.
5 posted on 12/23/2001 1:52:45 PM PST by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Whispering Smith
No, not until 2008, after whatever Dem loses to GW.
8 posted on 12/23/2001 1:53:56 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Whispering Smith
I wouldn't mind if that bitch ran so W could beat her soundly. I cannot see labor going for her whatsoever.
12 posted on 12/23/2001 1:57:11 PM PST by irish_lad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Whispering Smith
I would love for it to be Hillary. I just don't see her being able to win except for the very liberal states in the union.
16 posted on 12/23/2001 1:59:16 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Whispering Smith
Come on. It's Hilliary

Who in their right mind would run with her?

Richard W.

47 posted on 12/23/2001 2:22:33 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Whispering Smith
Come on. It's Hilliary.

'Fraid you're right. Maybe 2004 will be like 1992, when all the major Democrats stayed out of the presidential primary, figuring that Bush 1 was unbeatable, thereby paving the way for a certain second-tier candidate from Arkansas.

At least this time the Little General can't run as a spoiler. Hillary will have to run on her own charm.

63 posted on 12/23/2001 2:48:09 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson