Posted on 12/25/2001 9:48:24 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE
Let me tell you Squantos; that was no accident! -Tom
The mills of the Gods grind slowly, but they grind ever so exceedingly fine.
Correcto-mundo; you assume correctly.
No more IRS to threaten & browbeat political enemies. ~fini~
No more FBI to keep an eye on *family* interests; nor, give forewarning of potential gathering storm clouds on the political *horizon*?
No more GSA to be used to keep all other federal agencies in-line?
No more authority to issue murkey, "EO"s commanding the instantaneous this, that, & the other to suit & buttress his every Leftist Sociocomm whim?
No more legions of government financed scheisters who'll *breath-life* into the, "Living Document" baloney they tried palming-off for justifying their atrocities against our constitution?
No more recieving a current up-to-date listing of their Liberal, self-appointed, "Activist Judges" who used to be in their que & at the ready to formalize their outrageous shenanigans?
No more FCC to pressure media corporations (in any number of ludicrous ways) to report &/or release all the *news* not fit to print?
In short?
For the Clintigula worm, the gig's up.
The boy *now* stands alone bare-assed naked against the world, 'Bell.
Methinks he's come-around to understanding this too, don'tcha know. :o)
'Tis true The Sink Emporer -- Prince-of-Sinks recieves a government pension -- yes; & that pension's really just peanuts, in the scheme of things.
Even recieved a hunk of loot so he'd describe for us just how he was abused -- yes, he sure did; supposedly $106 it was said?
But *now*, the white trash hillbilly's gonna find out just how little that *paltry* sum goes; IF he intends to command the same influence he enjoyed while living in our house?
~Yes he will.
"...but I doubt very seriously that bill and hill will *ever* pay their own way for anything."
Correct again; and, while I agree with your sentiment?
It'd be important to note all things living have a natural life cycle, too.
...leeches, vampires, bloodsuckers & 'Rat thieves notwithstanding.
Second, how do you propose to "get rid of it?"
The, "it's" part is infinitesimal when compared to what this one's used to having a his beck & call command as a sitting POTUS.
The percentage of the power he's left is negligable.
And a Freshman Senator has practically no power a'tall.
Clintler's ass, "is" grass.
...faith first, then patience; the *fun* with this crook & traitor has only but begun.
Thanks for interesting thread, AR. A second impeachment is too good for this traitor. I wish, however, that you'd use the word "rolling" only in it's new "let's roll" form. Clinton doesn't roll, he slinks.
I'm afraid you speak the absolute truth. The vital question is......what can we here at FR and other patriotic Americans do to bring the real truth to light? I personally don't want to sit by and witness another "whitewash" investigation. I firmly believe attitudes have changed in America since 9/11 - of course the D.C. crowd doesn't realize this yet - and the vast majority will not tolerate any more BS from D.C. I plan to call, write, scream - whatever to get their attention - that we want the truth - not more political BS.
Merry New Year Captain ! ....Stay Safe !!
Most people know who the Enemy Within is.
I would like to see documentation of that statement, please.
Those who say they don't know who he/she/it is it's either because they are the enemy themselves, OR they have been brainwashed into being unable to recognize it (and are therefore confused) or have been brainwashed to recognize the non-enemy as the enemy.
This is a line of argument that is repeatedly used by various tyrants--any disagreement with the speaker's line of argument automatically becomes a sign that one is beyond the pale. It was profitably used by Bill Clinton on most Americans. Unfortunately for you, it cuts no ice here on Free Republic. Please offer evidence for your assertions.
Then there is that vast category of people who know who the Enemy Within is but are afraid or barred from revealing it. I belong to this latter group (ie, being stifled or barred from revealing it, I'm afraid).
Oh, really? First off, silence is generally considered consent. Your refusal to even name this enemy--assuming that the individual or group in question exists and is, indeed, the enemy--therefore assists the enemy in achieving his/her/its/their objectives and goals, and therefore makes you complicit in their actions.
"Second, how do you propose to "get rid of it?""
Your question above implies (in fact it more than "implies," it almost categorically asserts that there is an Enemy Within.
That is generally how logical argument works. The question is framed under the assumption that you will successfully demonstrate the identity and existence of "the Enemy Within" that you have alluded to.
Please correct me if I'm wrong on this assumption of mine) that if an answer to the question is given then it would accepted as the correct solution.
No, it is not automatically accepted as the correct solution, even if you manage to demonstrate (a) the existence of the enemy within, and (b) the identity of same. I test all claims with rigorous logic; failure in any one area of logic is the failure of your argument.
But I'm afraid if the answer to your question is given it would be ridiculed by you and others reading these threads.
If you effectively supply evidence to support your argument, it won't be. But you seem to be asking that we take everything on your say-so. It doesn't work that way around here.
Therefore, I think, that instead of asking the question, it would have been better to state whether you agree that there is such an enemy and that it needs to be annihilated. From that everything else would follow more easily.
Like I said, you have made the assertion, it it now incumbent on you to actually prove same.
...Blamed America's treatment of Indians and Slaves for the Terrorist Attacks on US ...thus justifyng the Terrorist Actions ...encouraging more.
...Blamed America's treatment of HomoSeXuals for their future Terrorist Attacks on America from Within in their last year of life due to Aids ...thus inviting them to become Terrrorists.
...Blamed President BUSH's TaX Cut for the Terrorist Attacks on US on 9-11-01 while trying to slice it to ribbons in the U.S. Senate.
...The Enemy Within = 1960's Terrorist CLINTONS...
You're all over that one,Ronnie!
Thanks for the heads-up on Bob's show.
"The enemy within our midsts is not foreign nor will it be destroyed by smart bombs. This foe of the Republic occupies the halls of Congress and sits at the table, in the Senate. Politicians that wear this badge of shame, proudly look into the camera, as they perfect their talent for lying. Their religion is the deception know as Liberalism."
Thank you for serving and all you do to help so many of us to learn and be informed.
For the Clintigula worm, the gig's up. The boy *now* stands alone bare-assed naked against the world, 'Bell. Methinks he's come-around to understanding this too, don'tcha know.
Agree. I think a nice little time-line of bill & hill events post 9-11 would prove that nicely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.