Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
In most jurisdictions, Back-flow preventors have been required for a decade on new taps for water service. However, the thousands of existing homes, facilities, fire sprinkler systems and irrigation systems that pre-existed that requirement have the ability to allow contaminants into the localized portion of the water system to which they are connected.

If an arm or potion of a system becomes polluted or contaminated it can be flushed and, even, sterilized. However there can be a lot of time for the contaminant to move within the system prior to finding the locale and source of a problem. First the illness must incubate or manifest symptoms. Then they have to be diagnosed. Then, after diagnosis, the illness has to be vectored back to a particular water source such as home, office or short-visited establishment that was contaminated internally or from outside, nearby, utility contamination. Even then, samples must be gathered and tested.

Perhaps one of the biggest issues is that we are a society that is angered by inconvienience. Shutting down a potion of a town's water system at the first inkling of a problem will produce backlash as toilets and washing machines must stop as well. Boil Orders aren't carefully followed in instances of benign contamination during a flood.

5 posted on 12/27/2001 7:19:33 AM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: KC Burke
Boil Orders aren't carefully followed in instances of benign contamination during a flood.

That shouldn't be the pain in the butt it has been in years past with all the bottled water out there. But yeah, for the other stuff it would suck.

27 posted on 01/01/2002 2:31:51 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson