Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plane takes off from Two Rock ranch without pilot
Santa Rosa Press Democrat ^ | December 27, 2001 | By CECILIA M. VEGA and JEREMY HAY

Posted on 12/27/2001 12:07:59 PM PST by WSGilcrest

Plane takes off from Two Rock ranch without pilot

Authorities fail to find craft, say it likely crashed after running out of fuel; search continues today

December 27, 2001

By CECILIA M. VEGA and JEREMY HAY
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

An unmanned airplane broke free from its moorings Wednesday while the pilot was working on it, taking off from a Two Rock ranch and flying over southern Sonoma County without a pilot for at least two hours.

Authorities concluded the single-engine airplane eventually crashed, but a search for the wreckage was suspended because of darkness.

"This will be in the aviation history books," said Walt Smith, regional coordinator for the Federal Aviation Administration.

"It's pretty wild," he said. "We're all shaking our heads. We thought we'd heard everything."

The search began shortly after 3 p.m. when Paul Clary III of San Rafael called 911 to report that his airplane had taken off from his son's Middle Two Rock Road ranch with no one aboard and enough fuel to fly for two hours.

Clary, 67, said he was fixing a flooded engine when the plane broke free from its moorings.

"It's a nightmare," he said while waiting to see if authorities could locate his plane before it crashed.

Clary said he had owned the plane, a 1946 Aeronca Champion, for about six years.

Sonoma County sheriff's deputies dispatched a helicopter to find the pilotless plane, but after about four hours of searching they gave up without ever seeing the yellow aircraft for themselves.

CHP also dispatched an aircraft, and some private planes may have joined the search.

Unconfirmed reports sent them to Cotati, the Sonoma Mountain area and back to Two Rock, but Sheriff's Sgt. Kevin Scanlon said the sightings all turned out to be false.

Reports to the Sheriff's Department also said an emergency locator signal was detected, and that the plane landed four miles east of Petaluma.

But authorities conducted both ground and aerial searches of the area and came back empty-handed.

Authorities plan to resume the search for the fallen aircraft early today.

"It certainly is down someplace and the nice thing about Sonoma County is it is rural in certain areas," Smith said, adding the situation could have been worse had the plane come down in a populated area.

Authorities at one point became so concerned with the plane's whereabouts that they notified the county's Office of Emergency Services, which sent out emergency broadcasts on local radio airwaves to warn the public of the potential danger.

"We've all been in the business for a while and this a fairly new one for us," Scanlon said.

On Wednesday afternoon, sitting grim-faced and clutching a cellphone, Clary, a San Francisco veterinarian, said he has flown planes for recreation since about 1951.

He flew in from Novato for a quick trip to his son's ranch and had been there for about 10 minutes before the incident began to unfold.

He stopped the plane after landing it and when he went to start it again, he said the engine flooded.

When he turned the propeller to try to start it, the engine turned over and because the throttle was forward and on high, the plane moved.

"It's my fault. The throttle shouldn't have been forward," he said.

Clary and his son chased the plane north in their minivan until "we just lost sight of it," said Paul Clary IV.

They were able to keep it in sight for no longer than five or 10 minutes.

"It's a disaster," the younger Clary said.

Scanlon said witnesses last saw the plane climbing in the air and guessed it likely reached at least 5,000 feet. Based on the amount of fuel in its tank, the plane's weight and the weather, authorities believe it probably headed in a northeastern direction.

"We know it ran out of fuel before darkness came," Smith said.

The 1,240-pound plane has two seats. It is made of fibers and canvas and was designed in the late 1930s or early 1940s. It was manufactured for about 20 years and was sold mostly for recreational flying.

While it's hard to believe the plane could take off by itself and fly without a pilot for at least two hours, it could -- technically -- be possible, Smith said.

"If the control services were trimmed or set properly, it could in fact fly itself," he said.

Smith said that while there was some discussion about using military aircraft to locate and intercept the plane, there never was any talk of having it shot down.

FAA inspectors will begin their investigation into the missing plane today.

"I'm sure there's going to be some kind of implication toward the pilot," he said. "We'll just have to see what went wrong."

You can reach Staff Writer Cecilia M. Vega at 521-5213 or cvega@pressdemocrat.com, and Staff Writer Jeremy Hay at 762-9667 or jhay@pressdemocrat.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/27/2001 12:07:59 PM PST by WSGilcrest (WSGilcrest@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
Yeah, right.

I just hate when my Cessna 182 inserts its own ignition key, fires itself up, removes the yoke safety stop all by itself, removes all of its wheel chocks, works the foot pedals to turn around many of the land based obsticles that would nose it into the ground, steers around other aircraft on its own, pulls its accelerator knob back and carb heat on, revs down the runway and takes off at an angle which causes flight, yet maintains, apparently, a lesser angle for two hours without flipping itself over. I just hate when that happens.

This "pilot" has a lot to answer for, IMO.

2 posted on 12/27/2001 12:21:04 PM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
I heard they found it.....crashed of course.
Darn, another Aeronca Champ gone!
3 posted on 12/27/2001 12:21:45 PM PST by KirklandJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
This would confuse the hell out of a Muslim terrorist when he tries to commandeer the aircraft.
4 posted on 12/27/2001 12:23:25 PM PST by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
This would confuse the hell out of a Muslim terrorist when he tries to commandeer the aircraft.
5 posted on 12/27/2001 12:25:36 PM PST by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
I just hate when my Cessna 182 inserts its own ignition key, fires itself up, removes the yoke safety stop all by itself, removes all of its wheel chocks, works the foot pedals to turn around many of the land based obsticles that would nose it into the ground, steers around other aircraft on its own, pulls its accelerator knob back and carb heat on, revs down the runway and takes off at an angle which causes flight, yet maintains, apparently, a lesser angle for two hours without flipping itself over. I just hate when that happens.

(Arkansas accent) Ah did not ... fly ... that ... airplane, and I never told anyone to lie about it, not a single time, never. Now I need to get back to the work of the American people.

6 posted on 12/27/2001 12:25:57 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
Now if the legislative branch of the government would just do the same.......
7 posted on 12/27/2001 12:26:12 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
Not that I claim to know anything about flying (other than on my computer), but I am familiar with the Two Rock area. Nothing but dirt roads and pasture land. The plane was not at any established airport, probably took off from a dirt road on his son's ranch.
8 posted on 12/27/2001 12:26:54 PM PST by WSGilcrest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
On an unrelated note, you don't cut down trees, wear high heels, suspenders and a bra by any chance? :0
9 posted on 12/27/2001 12:30:47 PM PST by WSGilcrest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Now if the legislative branch of the government would just do the same.......

What's that? Fly away and never come back? No new laws? We're not that lucky.

10 posted on 12/27/2001 12:35:46 PM PST by James Lewis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
probably took off from a dirt road

Not likely. A Champ is a tail dragger, and it is hard enough for a pilot to keep it going straight down an airstrip. More likely it was some pasture, and the plane got to go around in circles before taking off. Now, that must have been a sight to see! Technically, it is possible for the plane to take off without pilot, although the chances of that happening are about the same as of Bill Clinton joining a monastery and taking a vow of chastity.

11 posted on 12/27/2001 12:41:53 PM PST by Former Fetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
If the trim is set and the power is just right, its gone. It sounds like it was too.
12 posted on 12/27/2001 12:54:22 PM PST by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
Authorities...say it likely crashed after running out of fuel

Really?

13 posted on 12/27/2001 1:02:27 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
Contrary to some other posts here, this is not in the least bit unrealistic. Those older tube and fabric high wing planes have very low stall speeds, and being a tail wheel configuration already had a good angle of attack sitting on the ground. Add a little bit of power and away she goes.

I remember seeing a Piper Cub that was loosely tied down with about a 20-30 kt. wind coming straght down the nose. It strained against the chains and had all three wheels off the ground a couple of times until it was snugged down.

14 posted on 12/27/2001 1:04:08 PM PST by Jerry_M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
In Sydney, Australia, about 12 years ago (maybe longer, I'm getting old), a Tiger Moth took off by itself and circled the city for about four hours while the hotshots in the Australian Air Force tried to shoot it down.

It was quite a show.

15 posted on 12/27/2001 1:16:42 PM PST by Big Bunyip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
It's not only possible, this is hardly the first instance. There are probably hundreds of incidents like the following:

A Mooney M-20 took a brief unattended flight off the ANE airport about 15 yrs ago. It only flew about a half-a-mile, but had it been trimmed a little more nose-up it'd have gone to Canada to crash.

16 posted on 12/27/2001 1:20:46 PM PST by Aeronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest
Not only possible but probable under the right circumstances. Once upon a time, I knew a couple of guys who owned a Champ which needed to be hand proped. If one were flying it alone into a remote area, the modus opperendi was to tie the banner release hook [installed for just this purpose]to a secure object with a length of rope, pre-set the mixture and throttle, and hand prop the little beast. Once in caught it was a scramble to re-enter and pull the release lever. Assuming the pilot in this case did not have a release device, the A/C probably 'escaped' while he was untieing the tail wheel.
17 posted on 12/27/2001 2:01:02 PM PST by Res Nullius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Res Nullius
Didn't a WWII B-17 land itself in England? I think the Crew bailed out over the Channel after the craft was shot-up over Germany. Some farmer found the B-17 landed in his field!
18 posted on 12/27/2001 2:37:20 PM PST by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jerry_M
I was commenting on the fact that the pilot was negligent in not having the safety measures to prevent this in the first place. I was not saying that it was not possible, only that he had done everything completely incorrect.

IOW, a plane sitting with a clear path in front of it, started, with good trim already set, the chocks out of its wheels, and the RPM's cranked high enough to cause it to be able to accelerate at least past its stall speed (that causes takeoff ya' know), and the handbrake apparently not set (if this model has one, which I would find hard to believe that it doesn't. Its not *that* old, though I could be wrong). That is just not good piloting skills, no matter how you cut it.

19 posted on 12/29/2001 12:10:24 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack

I think YOU are negligent, my friend, for posting on here when you haven’t the slightest idea of reality.


20 posted on 07/24/2007 4:44:00 PM PDT by knocksomesenseintoyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson