Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Years Resolutions of Jonathan Edwards (1722-1723)
Jonathan Edwards | 1722-1723 | Jonathan Edwards

Posted on 12/31/2001 8:27:51 AM PST by Matchett-PI

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Theo
Here's a link: http://www.jonathanedwards.com/text/resolut.htm.
41 posted on 01/01/2002 6:27:47 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Just a general comment, no specifically related to Mr. Edwards.

It is a facile lie to say that one government is a theocracy and another ain't. All governments are theocracies, no law exists without a spiritual reason for it.

Practically there can be no separation of church and state, and yet the Founders did the right thing with the First Admenment -- they kept the tent of America open on all four sides. Too often harsh theocracies create great evils and distance themselves from G-d by saying only one door is open, and no others. It is usually a too narrow door detested by G-d.

The worst, I think, are the tyrants, facists and eliists who close all doors to their goverments.

42 posted on 01/01/2002 6:36:01 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
This is the "faith of our Fathers" we need to return to. Not the escape hell, grow healthy and wealthy (though certainly not wise) gospel of today's pop preachers.

May the plague of "self-esteem" be gone from our popular vocabulary, and be replaced by service, duty, and sacrifice. And may many more saints confused by the drivel of the "gospel" according to television preachers, find the rich streams of the faith that still flows from pastors like Edwards, Spurgeon, Whitfield, Owens, Watson, Pink, and others who handled the scriptures with reverence and grace.

43 posted on 01/01/2002 7:40:22 AM PST by Mahone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"Just a general comment, no specifically related to Mr. Edwards. Practically there can be no separation of church and state, and yet the Founders did the right thing with the First Admenment -- they kept the tent of America open on all four sides. .. The worst, I think, are the tyrants, facists and eliists who close all doors to their goverments."

The separation of church and state clause merely prohibits the government from setting up one state religion, like "THE Church of England".

There isn't a person alive who isn't "religious" in one way shape or form even if his religion is atheism. Therefore, there isn't a person alive who doesn't have a "worldview" (how he views the world around him).

So what to do? What to do?

America's Framers knew exactly what to do, because they were VERY familiar with Scripture, and therefore knew that a government based upon the "The Christian Worldview" is the best form of government to protect people's liberties and rights which they believed to be "God-given" and there for inalieable (cannot be taken away by men).

Note: The Christian Worldview is theistic in the sense that it believes in the existence of one infinite, supremely powerful, and personal God who has given us his infallible Word in writing - The Holy Scriptures.

Regardless as to whether people believe in that One Supreme Triune Being or His Word, the Bible, the only mentalities who hate the form of government that God commands in that Bible, are tyrannical mentalities whose goal is to obtain power and control over others. Tyrants will NEVER admit that the rights and liberties given to human beings, are inalieable because they come from an unchanging, all powerful God, and not from "the government".

Our Constitution stands in the way of tyrants -- and if upheld and defended, it effectively prevents tyrants / dictators from ever gaining absolute power and control in America.

And its all based upon the "Christian Worldview" / Judeo-Christian ethic:

For any governments of men to be valid in God's eyes they must [1] be limited, [2] based upon "the rule of law", [3] protect and defend the God-given rights and liberties of its citizens, [4] by punishing evil-doers (the lawless) swiftly.

The Constitution of the United States is a "Godly" document, because it conforms to God's loving standards of how to look out for the interests, rights and liberties of the weak and powerless. (Ditto for our other founding documents).

What citizen would have a problem with such a Godly government, whether they believe in that "God", or not?

Certainly not the law-abiding.

Only the lawless. Only cynical opportunists who want to take advantage of (or live at the expense of) others. Only tyranical mentalities who need to get the Constitution out of the way or changed so that the door will be opened for them to obtain total power.

Tyrants hate "limited government". We can be thankful that America's Framers allowed themselves to be greatly influenced by the Holy Scriptures when they set up our government.

America is freedom's last "real" stand, BECAUSE of our Constitution. Those who believe that ALL men's rights and liberties come from an infinite, UNCHANGING, all-powerful God, and are willing to defend that belief, are the noble of the earth. And they have HUGE targets on their backs, because they stand in the way of the greedy -- and in the way of the tyrannical mentalities, preventing them from getting what they want from others. fact.

44 posted on 01/01/2002 8:43:18 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Young Rhino
"[Edwards- a great Aerican theologian] Probably beats being one of America's greatest lawyers or used car salesmen...but not by much."

See reply #44.

45 posted on 01/01/2002 8:51:42 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mahone
Amen!
46 posted on 01/01/2002 8:54:20 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
"Would someone please forward this list to William Jefferson Clinton?"

Clinton only views God and religion as a tool to glorify himself in the eyes of the shallow/superficial mentalities Marx called, "useful idiots", and Barnum called, "suckers".

47 posted on 01/01/2002 9:37:37 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Theo
"I love this kind of rich stuff. I'd love if you could include me in your ping list."

Thank you very much, my friend! Will do!

48 posted on 01/01/2002 9:44:23 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
In the proto-form of the US...

So many images of G-d running around, the primordial forces, left by the Creator under the sway of mankind:

"to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind ..

In the spiritually awakened consciousness of the Founding times:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ..."

The three enumerated Rights:
  1. Life
  2. Liberty
  3. the pusuit of Happiness
, that governments are established to secure.

Life, we know easuily enough. It is also a respect for animal life.

Liberty .. why that is property, and the right to keep it, the right to own, the right to sell, the right to contract freely. It is also anti-sexual immorality.

But, "the pusuit of Happiness" -- what is that? That is our soul's sublime happiness in connection to G-d.

49 posted on 01/01/2002 10:01:29 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Add me to your ping list also. Thanks!
50 posted on 01/01/2002 10:02:16 AM PST by Pure Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pure Country
"Add me to your ping list also. Thanks!"

Will do! Thank you.

51 posted on 01/01/2002 3:16:06 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Thanks for the ping, PI.

Aim high...it's going to be a wonderful year.

52 posted on 01/01/2002 9:31:15 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I have a resolution too, read Jonathan Edwards this year. Thank you for the flag.
53 posted on 01/02/2002 10:29:10 AM PST by Prodigal Daughter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson