Internal Revenue Service: PASTORS MUST BE ORDAINED BY THE IRS

The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today, that specializes in keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service, is now boldly saying to the pastors of America that they not only have to be "ordained by God, but also the IRS."

They also say that the IRS is dictating terms to the churches by declaring in clear and no uncertain terms that, "The government doesn't want your Bible, they want your checkbook!" In seminars all over the US, Chitwood and Chitwood of Chattanooga, Tennessee, is repeating this startling announcement to pastors and church leaders. Without so much as a blush, Michael Chitwood, the main speaker, says, besides the above quotes, "Pastor, if you don't get your house in order, get ready, you are going to have a jail ministry" as he practically screams out to those present as to what pastors and church leaders must do to avoid jail time and the confiscation of church property by the federal government.

Besides giving the pastor his job description, which is based on the Roman Catholic model of worship and polity, the IRS is demanding many other things that are clearly designed to make the IRS Commissioner the new head of the churches in America Some of these demands are as follows: The church must collect a Federal ID (Social Security) number from visiting evangelists, missionaries, preachers and singers before they invite them to the pulpit.

They must give a Form 1099 to any minister who receives up to $600 in a years time, which includes missionary support. If the ID is not received, the church leaders must withhold a jeopardy assessment of 39% on the spot and send it to the IRS. They must agree to the IRS definition of benevolence. They cannot deal in cash at any level, but must deposit all offerings into a checking account and write checks for every purpose. This means, of course, that the church, in order to conduct its ministry, has to have an Employer Identification Number which must be provided by the IRS by filing Form SS-4 which a true New Testament church could never do and remain obedient to her Lord. In fact, church leaders would have to misrepresent the church as a religious organization rather than a N.T. Church to do so. Other things that pastors and church leaders are required to do are to be an informer against their members and also to preach only IRS prescribed sermons. Also, all fund raising material must be submitted to the IRS for their approval.

The job description for pastors is a list of nine specific sacerdotal duties which again is a Roman Catholic definition meaning sacred. The Catholic church teaches that these sacraments, when administered by a priest, are essential to ones salvation. This is totally opposite to the Bible definition which states that baptism and communion are memorials of the death, burial and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and that they follow salvation. The nine duties are: baptisms, weddings, serving the Eucharist (the Catholic sacrament of communion), teaching , spiritual counseling, christenings or baby dedications, administration of church affairs and the regular conducting of worship services. If the pastor does a substantial number of these things, he will receive very lucrative tax breaks. This is in clear violation of the scriptures concerning the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes which the Lord Jesus said that He hates (Rev. 2:6, 2:15). It is the setting up of a privileged class of clergy with benefits from the state that lay members do not receive. Others who minister to the church in the area of music, youth, children, education and other areas of responsibility don't qualify.

This is consistent with what officials of the IRS told Attorney David Gibbs of the Christian Law Association (CLA) in 1984 when they said that their definition of church is "once per week adult worship." They said that they did not consider such ministries as Sunday school, Christian school, busses, youth camp, vacation Bible school, nursing home, etc., to fall within their definition of the word "church". This Gibbs/IRS meeting took place in Washington, DC at the time that the so called champion of Christian liberty was hammering out a compromise with the Dole Committee (Sen. Bob Dole-R-Kansas) in the US Senate to bring the churches into compliance with the FICA tax (social security) laws. This was the deal that would eventually cause the raid and seizure of the Baptist Temple 17 years later. It's too bad that Gibbs didn't sound the alarm at that time and call the Bible believing pastors together for a summit meeting to map out a strategy that could have possibly saved our churches and ministries. The unregistered church pastors tried, but unfortunately our words fell on deaf ears. The so called "big" preachers were too busy receiving their tax deductible gifts and building their empires to be concerned over the future of God's work. Now the enemies of Christ have sprung the trap and it is too late.

These requirements should be intolerable enough by just the fact that the IRS would even dare to suggest duties for pastors, but to impose under the penalty of imprisonment and confiscation of property the same responsibilities of Roman Catholic priests is nothing short of naked tyranny. Obviously, the inquisition has returned and the pastors and churches of America are not even aware that it has arrived. The raid and seizure of the property of the Baptist Temple is the direct result of the pastors and church refusing to bow down to this new wave of Catholic terror that has come upon our land. The issue in the Baptist Temple case isn't taxes as the IRS, with the help of the media, has led the people of Indianapolis and nation to believe. The issue is very simple. Will the churches of America bow down to the IRS in violation of the first commandment, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me," or will they bow down to the Lord Jesus Christ? Our Lord said, "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon" (Matthew 6:24). The purge is now on as we hear of churches and ministries being closed on a regular basis. But there is still no evidence that the pastors have awakened from their stupor.

The benevolent requirements for churches are beyond atrocious. They are five in number: food, clothing, housing, medical emergencies and utilities. The church cannot help with transportation or auto repairs and a myriad of other things that churches have historically done on a regular basis. The church cannot make loans to the pastor, members, or others which churches have always done. Obviously, they want to make sure that the money lenders get their profits even from the poor. Can you imagine the government of the US limiting a church as to its duties in regarding charitable activity? There is no subject in the Bible that is nearer to the heart of God than charity. According to the apostle James, it is the test of pure religion (James 1:27). Paul the Apostle declares that charity is of higher value even than preaching and sacrifice (I Cor. 13:1-3). For the churches to debase such a high and noble service to Christ by submitting its administration to the wicked IRS is beyond belief. How will the preachers of America give an account of caving into this coercion by an abusive Bush administration who is continuing with the policies of those before him? How will church leaders face the Lord Jesus at the Judgment Seat of Christ when He asks them why they violated His clear commands concerning alms giving? He said, "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men, Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly." But now the churches are required to get the permission of the IRS before helping someone other than in the manner and purpose that they approve. Then records will have to be kept for the IRS so that the publicans can make sure that the church is in fact following their guidelines. And, of course, they expect church leaders to report this alms giving to the IRS so that they can even gouge the poor for more tribute. And all of this so the churches can keep their tax exemption and the people can get their precious tax deductions for their tithes and gifts. As James Dobson's organization said when challenged, "It's just good stewardship." Thievery, good stewardship? How sad.

It may be that the churches have now gone too far. When they begin building their dynasties on the backs of the poor our Lord, no doubt, will be swift in His removal of their candlestick. He said to the church at Ephesus, "Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works: or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent" (Rev. 2:5).

Two other developments concerning IRS control of churches has risen recently that should literally send shock waves through the religious community. First, while the churches are arguing doctrinal positions among themselves, and won't even spit on each other for the most part, the IRS has now developed its own super church. Independent Baptists in particular pride themselves in their anti-ecumenism. No fundamentalist preacher worth his salt would be caught dead at the local church federation meeting where he has to rub shoulders with a charismatic or liberal preacher. However, they don't think twice about paying a large fee to go to a Chitwood or CLA seminar and sit next to one of these religious outcasts to learn how to be a good IRS approved church and pastor.

It is now a fact that in order to get and keep the tax-exempt status a church must agree that all religions are equal. The new Application for Recognition of Exemption Form 1023 Schedule A for Churches (Rev. September 1998) demands a declaration to this effect with the following words at point #3: "Does the organization require prospective members to renounce other religious beliefs or their membership in other churches or religious orders to become members? Yes__ No__. If "Yes," describe."

It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out where they are going with this. In order to be considered a legal church (tax exempt) in America, the church or religious organization will have to declare that all religions are equal. They will also have to declare that they do not believe that their doctrinal position only results in converts to their faith having eternal life. They must renounce this narrow inclusivist position. Maybe we now know why Billy Graham, Robert Schuller, Pat Robertson, and other TV preachers have been making such fuzzy remarks about adherents of other religions, though sincere, going to heaven without receiving Christ. In that tax exemption is government subsidy, according to the Supreme Court in the Bob Jones University case, it is now clear that the US government will not support any religion that clings to the narrow minded belief that salvation is in Jesus Christ alone. Remember? "Come Shekels, Come Shackles." The world church isn't coming; it is already here, and the preachers don't have a clue as they go merrily along hand in hand with the Great Harlot to the wedding with the anti-Christ. (Rev. 17).

One of the reasons the IRS gave to Texe Marr's Living Truth Ministries for removing their tax exempt status is as follows: "Much of the material you disseminate promises to address possible conspiracies or threats, either from individuals, groups or various agencies, against Christianity, freedom or other rights. This is evident from a review of your newsletters and order forms. The titles and promotional materials are designed to sensationalize and grab the readers attention. They usually imply that the works will expose certain prominent groups, individuals, politicians or government agencies as being part of or linked to some threat or conspiracy." One of the titles that the IRS gave as an example included "Bible Prophecy and The Conspiracy."

Any grade school child in Sunday School knows that you can't teach or write on Bible prophecy without dealing with the second coming of Jesus Christ. But just as the Russian pastors under communism were forbidden to speak on this subject, we are now coming to the same place in our beloved land. It is obvious that if one believes in the literal return of the Lord Jesus Christ that they will be considered a domestic terrorist. In that the Lord Jesus will destroy wicked government upon His return in great glory and break the back of Gentile world rule, this message isn't popular with the in-for-hells and the high-heeled-belles that run our country today. Of course, they don't believe that He is coming, but they believe that we who do will be involved in what they call self-fulfilled prophecies and try to hasten His coming by blowing up everything in sight. Further evidence of this type of anti-Christ thinking surfaced recently when a brochure put out by the FBI in Phoenix, Arizona, named "potential domestic terrorists" that law enforcement should be aware of. One of those groups is "Doomsday/Cult-Type." Obviously, this would include all Bible believing preachers and churches in America. We not only believe that there will be a literal doomsday, we believe that the Lord Jesus Christ will bring the doom when He comes (Rev. 6:12-17). It won't do any good to claim that your church is not a "cult". The IRS definition fits the average Bible believing church to a tee.

Many have asked if we can actually show them this in the law. Our answer is no, we can't because you won't find a specific law that says that you can't preach on the Second Coming of Jesus Christ in America today. That's because they don't have to write a law to gain the same effect. All Congress has to do is to give an outlaw agency like the IRS a carte blanche privilege of making up their own so-called laws as they go along. The churches agreed to this when they signed their tax-exempt contract. They said that they would obey all laws, federal, state and local, presently and in the future. But they apparently didn't read the fine print. The new churches filing for tax exemption must agree to the following: "The Corporation or organization shall have no power to take any action that would be required for a tax exemption under Internal Revenue

Code Section 501(c)(3) and related regulations, rulings, and procedures." It is now the "procedure" of the IRS to refuse tax exempt status to those churches that will not agree that all religions are equal and who refuse to join through tax exemption, the world church. Also, preaching on Christ's coming is taboo.

For those churches which are foolish enough to believe that Sec. 508 of the IRS code allows an automatic exemption for churches, need to read it again. It doesn't say "exemption," it says, "...churches have a mandatory exception." The exception is from filing a Form 1023 to make application for not for profit status. Here is the kicker. Churches have to abide by the same rules that those that do file for this privilege. And if they do not, the IRS can, and most assuredly will, remove their tax exemption. The only thing missing is the annual Form 990 that other religious organizations have to file. When this is required, the churches will be under total control of the IRS with no wiggle room.

In the Baptist Temple court case, the church learned that a New Testament Church does not legally exist in the US today because there are no longer any First Amendment protections left. The genius of the First Amendment and various religious freedom clauses of the fifty states is that, for the first time in history, a N. T. Church could exist legally without having in the words of the IRS a "distinct legal existence." Now even a N.T. Church will be assigned by force the legal status of an association and will be expected to meet the same standards that the not for profits have to meet. But, they still won't have their God given right of a non-taxable status. This status is in contrast to an exempt status which is a privilege not a right.

The evidence as to what we are saying, though denied by most preachers, was made clear on January 24 this year in Tampa, Florida. IRS agent Melvin Blough testified in federal court that "once a church obtains the status of 501(c)(3) under the IRC they are trapped. The only way to be removed from a 501(c)(3) status is if the IRS chooses to remove the exemption. So if you dissolve the corporation and continue on as ABC church, an unincorporated church, you're still trapped in their web and under their control." He further testified that a church is automatically exempt under federal law without a 501(c)(3) designation. He also stated under oath that churches request the status just to get the governments stamp of approval. Even though Blough used the word "exemption" rather than "exception," he is essentially correct in his assessment of the plight of the churches of America. It is obvious that, regardless, the result is the same.

Comment:

The First Amendment is in tatters as far as Government making law affecting religion. Churchgoers have been too busy inadequately defending against the spurious attacks on its actions in the public square.

It is time for churches to no longer accept donations on the basis of tax exemptions! Church entanglement with government is unacceptable. Giving to the Lord through His pastors is the most fundamental worship (worthship). If one wishes to give to a purely charitable organization for a tax deduction, that's one thing but what a Church does with its money is between a pastor and his flock.

Certainly, the charitable resources of churches will be substantially diminished but its primary worship function will not be so sorely compromised. Only those focused on eternal things not walking to the course of this world will understand this.

If one wishes to give to a purely charitable organization for a tax deduction, that's one thing but what a Church does with its money is between a pastor and his flock.

Churches must withhold taxes from employees according to IRS guidelines, which the Baptist Temple did not do.

That's what got Dixon and his father in trouble and got their church shut down last year.

Dixon declared that all of his employees were "ordained" ministers and he declared them to be independent contractors.

You can also tell that Dixon is galled that the IRS is basing its guidelines on the model of the Roman Catholic Church.

Dixon seems, at bottom, to believe that there should be no taxes associated with his ministry in any way.

Render to Caesar, pastor Dixon.

hence the beauty of the BIBLICAL model for churching... the disciples met daily house to house... and in the temple (till its destruction) to worship.

NO PLACE in the new testament does it require that we buy a building take up tax exempt offerings and send out receipts. we CAN give to each other... and use cash, food, our own wheels or help each other with finding jobs and meaningful work. The idea that Jesus NEEDS tax exemption from the IRS to keep HIS buildings, so we can all get together and take up tax exempt offerings is RIDICULOUS.

We don't need temples... if we are believers, we ARE the temple. The church owned NO buildings for the first generation or two of christians. did alright. Part of our problem is the concept of "the church is a business", when in fact it is not even a physical thing.

The catholic model is not MY model. The baptist is not either. Both are throwbacks to earlier days... the former is a throwback to the 'dark ages' concept of "burn em at the stake" christian feudalism... the second is the epitome of "microsoft with a crucifix" corporate blindness.

Jesus does not need either "model" to get the good news out that sins are forgiven, help the poor and sick of our world and assure them that a new day is coming.

The downside is the extreme religious crowd MIGHT have to go out of their ascetic caverns however and "dirty" their hands along with the rest of us by "doing some work" for sinners in the evil world they scream about every week. Might do em some good.

The fact that the author of this piece is a blatant liar where Catholic belief and practice are concerned leads me to conclude that he is not to be trusted.

Maybe, if he wants me to listen to him, he can start by not lying about my religion, and not blaming my faith for the depredations (or alleged depredations) of the IRS.

Bearing false witness against a neighbor is a sin. The Bible says so. "The Church of Liars for Jesus" really seems to miss the point of following Him who said, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Light".

Ah, excuse me, but please note that the article says:

The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today....In seminars all over the US, Chitwood and Chitwood of Chattanooga, Tennessee....

Sorry, friend, but the article looses all credibility for me here. After all, who ever heard of Chitwood and Chitwood from Chattanooga. Is this a joke? Whoever they are, they are certainly NOT the "most prominent and successful public accounting firm in the nation today."

Whoever this firm is, it appears that they may have developed a niche market targeting paranoid preachers.

I guess that the separation of church and state idea only works when the government deems it necessary?

Throw prayer out of school? "Ok", says the government. Never use the word "G*d", as in "God Bless America!"? "Ok", says the government. "The church and state must be separate", says the ACLU.

But, oh wait, we want to make sure to RAPE the church for tax revenues, so everything except for taxation.

This seems fair, don't you think. < /sarcasm >

The truth is that no government agency can "ordain" anyone. This is a religious act that can only be carried out by a bonafide (key word: bonafide)religious organization. Now, it is true that to be a "tax exempt" religious organization, certain rules apply. It must be founded on principles consistent with religious foundation, and recognized as such by the state government (taxing authority) and federal government (IRS). IT DOES NOT (repeat: NOT) REQUIRE A 501(c)(3) status. Only these 501(c)(3) organizations are kept under political control. If a church opts out of filing as a 501 (c)(3) organization, the IRS has no jurisdiction, as long as proper use of funds has been practiced. No tax filing is required. Records must be kept, however. Anyone breaking these simple rules deserves to lose any tax exempt status.

To those of you who might not be aware:

The IRS doesn't give a damn about church monies so long as they get a cut.

My dad's Investment Counselor from Merrill Lynch had a meeting with us last week, and during the conversation informed us that he has five clients, all of whom are Ordained Catholic Priests from the south burbs of Chicago (Orland park, Mokena, Tinley, etc...) who have holdings in excess of $3M with Lynch. The least wealthy Priest has about $500,000 on account with them. As long as they pay their taxes, and declare said funds to the IRS as income, this is, apparently, perfectly legal.

Upon seeing me spit my food out, our broker informed me that though immoral, unethical, and downright shi--y, many priests lift cash from the collection plates and keep it, after all, they are entitled to do so LEGALLY, so long as they report it to the IRS. Of course, none of the church patrons know this, or they'd all be writing checks, which must be deposited to church accounts, or giving nothing at all. I have long ago joined the nothing at all crowd, and would advise all of you to do the same, if your local priest is unwilling to disclose his tax returns.

You must be a liberal since you employ their oft used technique of cutting quotes at just the right place to support their positions. The full context:

The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today, that specializes in keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service,

"NO PLACE in the new testament does it require that we buy a building take up tax exempt offerings and send out receipts. we CAN give to each other... and use cash, food, our own wheels or help each other with finding jobs and meaningful work. The idea that Jesus NEEDS tax exemption from the IRS to keep HIS buildings, so we can all get together and take up tax exempt offerings is RIDICULOUS."

Good points. TV evangelist have made a mockery of Christian faiths. I believe Christ shunned large churches, and told the faithful that he is with those who worship in the small gathering.

You are correct about the building aspect and the 'professional' clergy.

However, start up a 'house church' and you will soon discover that the government will be all over you like a cheap suit.

The first visitor will be from your city government, citing you for violating the zoning ordinances.

The next visitor will be from your local neighborhood association (if you have one) with an injunction regarding the number of cars parked on the street near your home.

Finally, if ANY money -- even one red cent -- is loaned, given, or bequeathed to anyone in your group and is not reported, the whole group of you will be charged with numerous federal felonies.

Don't believe me? Just try it.

We are at war. The author of the article is fighting one front. But don't think for an instant that all fronts aren't under attack.

The most prominent and successful certified public accountant firm in the nation today, that specializes in keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service,

Nice try, but for it to clearly mean what you are implying, the sentence would have to be re-written as such:

The most promiment and successful certified certified public accountant firm in the nation today at keeping churches out of trouble with the Internal Revenue Service...

Don't blame this poster for not understanding the bad writing of the author...

As Campion and sinkspur have observed, Dixon has (a) lied about the teachings of the Catholic Church, and (b) lied about the details of the Indianapolis Baptist Temple case--but, then again, he also lied to the IRS about the employees of the IBT, as well.

It seems that he Mr. Dixon has some...er...how to put this delicately...issues about taxation and the IRS.

Also, note that he doesn't practices that, if allowed for "churches," would make forming a "church" a favored method for money laundering. Good heavens! Requiring that monies be properly accounted for? How is an Honest, Upstanding, God-Fearing Pastor to skim from the collection plate if such apostasies are mandated?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.