[Republican_Strategist]

Well let me correct this misleading phrase you people or maybe its one of you with perhaps many different names that Michael Rivero is simply questioning therefore what is doing is o.k.

Well first of all he portrays “America’s Enemy” as small Afghan children insinuating all we are doing is killing children. That is different than questioning.

Doctoring evidence to claim a tape is false is fraud. It is meant to purposely deceive and harm our cause which is the war. That isn’t questioning. That is an attack.

Finally you are trying to hide behind questioning the government when all I’m doing using your logic is questioning and you are trying to stop or stave my criticism of Rivero.

[Razz]

...all I’m doing using your logic is questioning and you are trying to stop or stave my criticism of Rivero.

Next time you type a reply, look above the box where you are typing ... notice that sentence? No? Here, let me help you out:

Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.

Since you clearly, by your own admission, know that you are deliberately ignoring that, I think you might as well enjoy your remaining time at FR.

[jammer]

Actually, no. I agree with you that Rivero is over the top sometimes. And I have posted several anti-Bush or anti-Republican-stance replies that JimRob has never taken off (some of which he should have :)). Much ado about nothing. So "censorship" of this site is a non-existent, non-issue to me.

Reply #65 states it for me very well. I was only disagreeing with you on two things: the attack on Nita, most of which I thought was gratuitous, and the pernicious idea that to criticize the government is "Anti-American". On that last, evidently, you and I are unalterably irreconcilable.