Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CLINTON URGES ANTI-TERRORISM ACTION
PBS, via Drudge ^ | August 6, 1996 | clinton, speech transcript

Posted on 01/09/2002 7:09:31 AM PST by tsomer


President Clinton, in a speech in Washington at Geoge Washingon University, decries Congress' response to his anti-terrorism proposals, urging passage of laws that would increase wiretapping and allow explosives taggants.

PRESIDENT CLINTON: We have pursued a concerted national and international strategy against terrorism on three fronts. First, on the international front, stopping the spread of terrorism clearly requires common action. The United States has a special responsibility to lead in this effort.

Over the past four years, our intelligence services have been sharing more information than ever with other nations. We've opened up a law enforcement academy in Budapest, which is training people from 23 nations, an FBI office in Moscow, and just last Friday, Congress gave us the funding for FBI offices in Cairo, Islamabad, Tel Aviv, and Beijing.

I've also worked to rally other nations to the fight against terrorism--last year, at the UN General Assembly, this spring at the historic summit of peace makers at Sharm El-Sheikh, where 29 nations, including 13 Arab nations, for the first time condemned terrorism in Israel and anywhere else it occurs in the Middle East and throughout the world, at the G-7 summit in Lyons, and the recently held follow on conference we called for in Paris, where we were represented ably by the attorney general.

Now the point of all these efforts with other countries is not to talk but to act. We will not rest in our efforts to track down, prosecute, and punish terrorists, and to keep the heat on those who support them. And we must not rest in that effort. The second part of our strategy is to give American law enforcement officials the most powerful tools available to fight terrorism without undermining our civil liberties.

In the wake of Oklahoma City, I strengthened a terrorism bill I had previously sent to Congress but which had not then been passed. Despite the vow of Congress to act quickly, it took a year before that bill came to my desk to be signed. The bill had some very good points. It made terrorism a federal offense, expanded the role of the FBI, imposed the death penalty for terrorism. As strong as it was, however, it did not give our law enforcement officials other tools they needed and that they had asked for, including increased wire tap authority for terrorists to parallel that which we have for people involved in organized crime now, and chemical markers for the most common explosives so that we can more easily track down bomb makers.

After the bombing in Atlanta, Congress said it would reconsider these and other measures. I immediately called the congressional leadership to the White House and urged them to put together a package and vote it into law before they left for the August recess last Friday. I am disappointed and more importantly, the American people are disappointed that that job was not done.

These additional measures would save lives. They would make us all more secure. When the Congress returns from the August recess, we will take them up again, and we must get the job done.

Finally, the third front of our struggle against terrorism is the airports and airplanes that bring us all closer together. Air travel remains the safest form of transportation, and our airlines have the best safety record and security record in business. But that's of small consolation when a single attack can take so many lives.

Last year, we began field testing new high tech explosive detection machines in Atlanta and San Francisco. We significantly increased security at our airports, and the FAA created a new government and industry panel to review airline security. After the TWA crash, I ordered new measures to increase the security of air travel. As any of you have flown in recent days will have noticed, we're doing more hand searches and machine screening of luggage. We're requiring pre-flight inspections for every plane flying to or from the United States, every plane, every cabin, every cargo hold, every time. The Vice President is leading a commission on aviation security that is to report back to me within 45 days with an action plan to deploy machines that can detect the most sophisticated explosives and other needed changes.

Now I know all this has led to some extra inconvenience for air travelers, and it may lead eventually to a modest increase in the cost of air travel. But the increased safety and peace of mind will be worth it.

But I want to make it clear to the American people that while we can defeat terrorists, it will be a long time before we defeat terrorism. America will remain a target because we are uniquely present in the world, because we act to advance peace and democracy, because we have taken a tougher stand against terrorism, and because we are the most open society on earth.

But to change any of that, to pull our troops back from the world's trouble spots, to turn our backs on those taking risks for peace, to weaken our opposition against terrorism, to curtail the freedom that is our birthright would be to give terrorism the victory it must not and will not have.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Another article from CNN alledges the same thing.

Guess this is from the meeting in Harlem last week.

1 posted on 01/09/2002 7:09:32 AM PST by tsomer (tsomer@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tsomer
Yep. I don't know if the proposal included putting taggants in box cutters and jet fuel though. Maybe Monica's HBO special will provide additional information on the predating, perjurorious, grifting Sink Emperor's war on terror....
2 posted on 01/09/2002 7:17:12 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
As any of you have flown in recent days will have noticed, we're doing more hand searches and machine screening of luggage. We're requiring pre-flight inspections for every plane flying to or from the United States, every plane, every cabin, every cargo hold, every time. The Vice President is leading a commission on aviation security that is to report back to me within 45 days with an action plan to deploy machines that can detect the most sophisticated explosives and other needed changes.

And yet the worst attack on American soil still took place because of the Clinton Era open-door come-on-in-stay-as-long-as-you-want-don't-forget-to-vote-democrat immigration policies.

3 posted on 01/09/2002 7:17:31 AM PST by randog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
"The Vice President is leading a commission on aviation security that is to report back to me within 45 days with an action plan to deploy machines that can detect the most sophisticated explosives and other needed changes"

Immediately after this speech the DNC accepted $500,000.00 from Tom Daschle's wife, who is a lobbiest for the Airline Industry. Needless to say, NOTHING WAS DONE to improve airline security despite Al Gore heading the "Aviation Security Commission".

I wonder why the media doesn't report these facts?

4 posted on 01/09/2002 7:22:50 AM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
This guy isn't even a decent shadow president.

Sit down & shut up, fat boy.

5 posted on 01/09/2002 7:23:33 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
Anyone who wants to get madder should read this: Republicans Watered Down 1996 Clinton Anti-Terrorism Bill, Thanks to Lott & Hatch.
6 posted on 01/09/2002 7:26:02 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
First person, First person, First person, in a gramatical sense.

BC is not first in anything.

7 posted on 01/09/2002 7:30:06 AM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGZ
First in denigrating the presidency.
8 posted on 01/09/2002 7:34:31 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
Yea Bubba Klinton, you're only 10 years late and if you had been doing your job instead of getting bj's in office we wouldn't have had this whole mess...
9 posted on 01/09/2002 7:45:56 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
Like the chains on Marley's Ghost

The "clinton legacy" has been forged one sordid link at a time....

Madison Society - Slick Willy
... THE CLINTON TIME LINE. The Etherzone provides, in one location, all the events
of the Clinton Ongoing Corruption from 1977 through 2000. Read more. ...

CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:
... And that gets to my second chart, Mr. Speaker, which is the time line.....Up until
1993, Mr. Speaker, under Democrats and Republican Presidents alike, there ...

The Holiday *Best* of Bill Clinton & his Friends!

The Cost of Life (Clinton/Gore Sellout of Security for Campaign Contributions) **FR EXCLUSIVE** #2

10 posted on 01/09/2002 7:52:33 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
Check the date-- Aug 6, 1996. The link on Drudge's page is to an article from the same date.
11 posted on 01/09/2002 7:53:17 AM PST by 74dodgedart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
RE: post 3.....yeah...I understand Daschle's wife lobbies for one of those machine screening (of luggage) equipment companies - and I BELIEVE the company makes equipment that the FAA is now required to buy, (buried in a recent bill)but won't use, because they don't TRUST it.
12 posted on 01/09/2002 7:57:35 AM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Immediately after this speech the DNC accepted $500,000.00 from Tom Daschle's wife, who is a lobbiest for the Airline Industry. Needless to say, NOTHING WAS DONE to improve airline security despite Al Gore heading the "Aviation Security Commission".

I wonder why the media doesn't report these facts?

Actually it was reported on the O'Reilley Factor in late Sept. or early October. Victoria Cummock, the lone dessenter on the commitee was on his show and reported how Gore tried to schmooze her into changing her vote to agree with the commissions findings, so Gore could report back to Clinton that the recommendations were unanimous. Cummock said "no, that she refused to have blood on her hands if something were to happen." Gore reported back to Clinton that it was unanimous anyways and a few weeks later got his 1/2 million dollar bribe.

Also Dateline reported on this back in 1998 or 1999, but NBC has made no mention of this since 9/11

13 posted on 01/09/2002 9:08:17 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 74dodgedart
But the fact that it's being cited today is curious, don't you think? I mean, who fed it to Drudge? This smells like Clinton: muddying the water, fishing out sound bites, allegations and character smears and dispensing them to the pigeons in the media.

Yes, even Drudge is going to jump on something like this.

14 posted on 01/09/2002 11:08:32 AM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson