Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia wary of America's stance on military bases
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 01/10/2002 | Ben Fenton

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:34:30 PM PST by Pokey78

PENTAGON officials indicated yesterday that America's military presence in Central Asia could last for years, prompting unease in Moscow.

America's commitment not to abandon the area after defeating the Taliban in Afghanistan has been interpreted in a very negative light by conservatives in the Russian military and political hierarchy.

Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defence in Washington, told the New York Times that the staffing of air bases in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan was likely to be expanded into increased programmes of co-operation and training with local military commands.

"Their functions may be more political than actually military," Mr Wolfowitz said.

The bases and exercises conducted from them in the future would "send a message to everybody, including important countries like Uzbekistan, that we have a capacity to come back in and will come back in. We're not just going to forget about them".

But Gennady Seleznyov, speaker of the Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, said during a visit to the Kazakh capital, Astana, yesterday: "It is not desirable that permanent US bases be established in central Asia."

Russia says 2,000 American troops are deployed at Khanabad air base near the Uzbek capital, Tashkent, while US air force staff are operating at Kulyab in Tajikistan.

About 200 American, British and French engineers are building an air base near Bishkek, capital of Kyrgyzstan.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/09/2002 5:34:30 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Right on. Split the Trans-Asian Axis in half. There needs to be an impenetrable buffer of US and allied forces separating Russia from China. The more we can be the wedge in Central Asia, the less favorable will be the geopolitical position of the TAA.
2 posted on 01/09/2002 7:14:52 PM PST by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
Welcome to the paranoid view. First, considering that Russia and China share a border, the more the US sticks its nose in there the more it drives Russia and China togather. Or haven't you noticed that from the last 8 years of stupid diplomacy? Most likely not.
3 posted on 01/10/2002 7:11:09 AM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson