Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
If you can interbreed, you are considered in the same species.

Just this morning I read a claim in Arctic Dreams by Barry Lopez (highly recommended!) that polar bears and brown bears can in some cases produce viable offspring.

As for Neanderthals, the genetics suggest that they were separate species. Until the mitochondrial DNA data came in, they always were considered two varieties of homo sapiens. I don't see how comparative anatomy can trump that.

22 posted on 01/10/2002 8:33:16 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
The study you refer to compared DNA from Neaderthals to DNA from Modern Homo sapiens. Until they perform a similar study on DNA from Neaderthals and DNA from Archaic Homo sapiens, the jury is still out. Even the DNA of Homo sapiens can be expected to change over a time frame of thousands of millenia.

I think this entire issue has been clouded by politically correct scientists not wanting to imply that "modern" Homo sapiens from Eurasia did not directly originate from Africa. In actuality, BOTH Neanderthal man and Homo sapiens originated in Africa, so this is really a non-issue.

If mammologists were viewing the skeletal remains of populations of hogs, deer, or any other taxa of mammals other than hominids, the apparent differences between Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis/H. s. neanderthalensis would hardly be considered adequate to separate the populations into two distinct species.

Take a Neanderthal, give him a bath and a shave, and put him in a business suit, and he wouldn't stand out in any major city on earth today.

32 posted on 01/10/2002 9:27:43 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson