Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wok the Dog - What's wrong with eating man's best friend?
Slate ^ | Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 3:56 PM PT | William Saletan

Posted on 01/17/2002 7:17:24 AM PST by Tai_Chung

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: ken5050
You're on a droll, my man.
21 posted on 01/17/2002 7:53:23 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Of course its a cultural thing for us in the West to treat Fido as family. But that cultural thing goes back tens of thousands of years to when man and dog partnered up as scavengers and, eventually, hunters. It's probably no coincidence that the cultures which have kept the bargain with their canine partners enjoy the highest standards of living in the world, while the dog eaters would be eyeing up their neighbor as soon as the canine cuisine became scarce.
22 posted on 01/17/2002 7:54:11 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2right
Let them eat cat!
23 posted on 01/17/2002 8:03:56 AM PST by arthurus dot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Hot dogs are a national food! Where was the origin of this name? Is there a secret out there?
24 posted on 01/17/2002 8:05:12 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
LOL! I love it!!!

An old mountain man once told me the difference between what he would and would not eat was about 24 hours...!

My mother-in-law went through the nazi occupation in Norway and spoke of how domestic pets (a rabbit in her case)
became soup for many as things got tighter.

Never say Never, as you don't know the lengths you will need to go to when the rubber meets the road...

25 posted on 01/17/2002 8:11:33 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Oh NO! That's MY dog!!!


26 posted on 01/17/2002 8:19:51 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Was your dog. Actually, nose markings are different.
27 posted on 01/17/2002 8:22:01 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

All Those Heroes
Search and Rescue Dogs included.

28 posted on 01/17/2002 8:50:08 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Actually, Teach, that's MY dog (or at least it was until Martha got ahold of him!)
29 posted on 01/17/2002 9:23:04 AM PST by slugbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RayBob
"But dogs are animals. They are not furry people. "

Yes, they're not. In some ways, they're better!

30 posted on 01/17/2002 9:50:54 AM PST by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: slugbug
No, he's MINE! I paid for him! I didn't realize at the time that he would be too cute to be a gift! You already have enough beauty in your home, I need more! MINEMINEMINEMINEMINE! =^)
31 posted on 01/17/2002 10:07:37 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
It's probably no coincidence that the cultures which have kept the bargain with their canine partners enjoy the highest standards of living in the world, while the dog eaters would be eyeing up their neighbor as soon as the canine cuisine became scarce.

It seems to me that South Korea (with a US-style economy) is doing all right.

32 posted on 01/17/2002 10:08:21 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Dear Martha,
When stationed in Korea, I heard the stories about dog eating, saw the pens in which they kept the favorite breed for eating, and even was told by locals that the government had driven the public eating of dog underground.

I determined that I would find one of the places that served dog and try it at least once. Since I'd tried everything else Korean, including those little dried fish and the red-peppered snails, I figured dog would only be fair.

The day came. I had dog. I can describe EXACTLY what it tastes like. Dog owners will know immediately what I'm saying.

Do you know how a dog smells when it comes in from a big rain, soaking wet?

That's PRECISELY how it tastes.

I didn't ask for seconds. I haven't craved more.

Finally, Martha....are you related to Diane Sawyer?

33 posted on 01/17/2002 10:21:19 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Why do you think they're called Chows?


34 posted on 01/17/2002 10:28:08 AM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Koreans and Dog Meat

By Professor Yong-Geun Ann, Ph.D. (aka Dr. Dogmeat)

Chungcheong College

Hyo-Il Publishing Company

I wrote this book for two reasons. One is to make known worldwide the history and tradition in which Koreans have eaten dog meat, the various recipes and the traditional concept of dogs and the other is to eliminate the controversy surrounding the edibility of dog meat.

All humans try to improve the environment in which they are placed and enhance the quality of their living, which is the essence of culture. A group or society forms a relatively unique culture thereby outlining its distinctness. But western culture has a strong tendency to dislike the foods of other cultures. It is this prejudice which puts the 'foreign' culture's food in the wrong.

Eating dog meat is Korea's own inherent food culture, which has a long history. Nevertheless, some extremist animal protection groups chastise consumers, threatening them with a campaign to boycott Korean products, even promoting the nonparticipation in the 2002 World Cup. Pros or cons arguments over the edibility of dog meat are rising again since some Koreans who do not like dog meat are voicing their opinions.

The debate over the edibility of dog meat is not worthy of a second thought. The history that Koreans used dog meat as food was originated from such a long time ago long that it cannot be dated back. Koreans have eaten dog meat more than any other. As certain dogs in Korea are raised for domestic consumption, Koreans should not be ashamed due to the misguided views of others.

Giving in to pressure from mostly foreign dissenters, Korea has banned the use of dog meat. In doing so, this has reduced the sovereignty of Korea and what it stands for. That is the revelation of submissive idea under the influence of foreign country to lower ourselves down, having a negative view on dog meat.

The resumption of the controversy over the edibility of dog meat is due to the federal government's tepid attitude. The federal government should allow nationals to slaughter dog and eat it by law, regulating the whole process ranging from breeding to slaughtering, processing, and distribution, and let Koreans eat dog meat without trepidation. Regrettably, the federal government hasn't made any decision on it up to now. It is due to the fact that the government is being pulled in opposing directions with the animal rights activists on one side and the dog meat consumers on the other.

Another important reason is from the fact that country that exports beef to Korea is eager to block the legality of dog meat according to the newly-revised international trade order following the Uruguay Round. The reason is by banning the consumption of dog meat, Korea's importation of foreign beef with increase by the same amount

Basic problem over the edibility issue is left up to Koreans alone. Though government authorities drive dog meat restaurants into the 'underground', many Koreans still enjoy dog meat. Will it be possible for Koreans not to eat dog meat, and will the criticism and attacks cease if government should take measures to ban dog meat? The attitude of feeling shame by eating dog meat, of humbly lowering ourselves, shifts the cause of the problem and only hinders the solution, spoiling our pride.

The only way of solving the problem is to recognize dog meat as a traditional food and develop it further. In many ways, Korea is historically and culturally among the top in the world, but it lacks not only in a firm pride and belief in a traditional culture, but also in a strong will to make it known worldwide. Now, people around the world show a great enthusiasm to the export of their culture. We should be proud and have a belief of what we have. It is required to make various food using dog meat and gourmets should come to Korea to enjoy dog meat. For this, Korea needs to set up a research institute, invest in research, and also breeders of dogs and dog meat restaurant owners should form an association, insisting on their own claims, with the expansion of their interests. By doing so, we should make known worldwide our unique culinary culture of dog meat. Hyo-Il Publishing Company

Address : 254-32 Yongdudong, Tongdaemungu, Seoul, 130-070, R. O. Korea

Tel : (02) 924-6643, 928-6644, Fax: 927-7703
Home page : www.hyoilco.co.kr
Price : 10,000 Won
Pages : 347
From separate page:

2. The love of pet dogs is a true maltreatment of animals

According to the law of the survival of the fittest, the strong and the superior survive. The dog is an animal that had been managing to live for itself, and whose forefather is the wolf and wild dog. From its domestication, the dog has lost its function for survival. The more humans fend for the dog, the more the dog is deprived of its self-reliance. Feeding, loving, vaccinating, and providing it shelter all accelerate in weakening the dog. Moreover, the more a dog is crossbred to make it cute and small, the weaker its adaptability for living becomes. If this is the trend, the dog will come to lose its fighting instinct for living and be weakened; therefore, dogs are completely dependent on humans and can only survive if cared for. The person who demands a pet dog is really being abusive to the dog species as a whole.

The act of taming a dog, cutting and styling its fur, adorning it with clothing, thinking of it as a plaything, and loving it, are forms of mistreatment as well. Such things are not desirable or helpful to a dog. These are things that people are willing to do in their own interest. Even living with a dog is a kind of mistreatment. In some cases a dog is used for protection, but is it the dog owner's intention to keep separated from other humans while living with a dog?

As humans should live among humans, so should dogs.

In reference to this statement, loving dogs is self-complacency, or a sort of mistaken one-sided love towards a dog, and this dysfunctional love weakens the dogs natural instincts. On the other hand, because small and weak dogs are not very useful, the cultures that eat dog meat help to select and maintain the dominant breeds.

The correct way to show love toward the dog is to leave it in its natural state. Leaving it in this condition assures the dog the opportunity to propagate its own breed without the aid of human intervention. Through this process the weak can be naturally weeded out while the strong survive.

35 posted on 01/17/2002 10:45:29 AM PST by testforecho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
"It seems to me that South Korea (with a US-style economy) is doing all right."

When their "US-style economy" grows to where the luxury of dogs as pets becomes common, dogs as food will become as repulsive an idea there as it is here.

36 posted on 01/17/2002 11:03:50 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
"The correct way to show love toward the dog is to leave it in its natural state."

Problem is, wherever this occurs, there is the problem of the dogs eating the humans.

37 posted on 01/17/2002 11:06:58 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
"...advertise recipes on English-language Web sites."

Where? Where? Inquiring minds want to know!

38 posted on 01/17/2002 11:10:38 AM PST by TexasRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
If we wheren't supposed to eat dogs then why are they made out of meat?
39 posted on 01/17/2002 11:22:11 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Yer right Bob...I've eaten dog many times in Korea, and a few times in the Philippines...like you say, one man's friend is another man's feast...Men have been eating dogs since there've been men and dogs...some of my best friends have been dogs...some people say my only friends are dogs...

The authors point about about moral relativism is right on the money...many Americans own horses and consider them friends or companions...why aren't they attempting to stop the European practice of eating horse-flesh? Maybe they are, but you ain't hearing about it.

40 posted on 01/17/2002 11:25:05 AM PST by g'nad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson