There is a great book, MARTYRS MIRROR, written in 1660, which chronicles the existance of a true church with scriptural doctrine from the time of the early church forward. It also chronicles the persecution of that church. Highly recommended.
It is difficult to follow any kind of an argument based on unsupported premises.
A brief paragraph on each of the assertions above (the Jehovah Witnesses, the Calvinists and Mormons) might be useful to maintain the illusion that the article is intended to shed light and not heat.
In addition, any mind that cannot make a distinction between "tenet" and "tenant" is not ready for prime time. At least not for me.
Acts 20:29-31 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears.
II Timothy 1:15 This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me; of whom are Phygellus and Hermogenes.
By the end of the first century the only apostolic procession was by these grievous wolves. We must look to the scriptures themselves, not the church tradition laid by grievous wolves in sheeps clothing.
Scripture should be the guide. Jesus Christ is the Son of God. God is not aman that he should lie. Jesus Christ is a man. I understand church tradition. I also understand mans ability to get it wrong especially in established institutions and governments. Abortion is held as a "right" by the USSC, but it does not make it a right in the true sense of the word as used by our founders. What the govt says is not to be confused with what the consitution says. The same concept goes for "church fathers" as opposed to the Word of God itself.
Religion is, was and always will be mans invention, what man does and says. Christianity is what God has done, is doing and will do in and through Jesus Christ.
The Old Testatment and the New, both show in much detail how God operated through personalities, some that even wanted to be far away from God, and some who wanted to sell God's gift of prophecy for money.
I think it should be understood that God in giving examples of performing His work through some humans, of unsavory character, was able to get what He wanted done. He would have no problem whatsoever in using unsavory men to put together the Bible into a letter to mankind. Hope this helps your understanding and lightens your heart over being able to trust God's letter to you.
Just teasing you as I mark this for follow-up. Should be entertaining if the opening volleys are any indication.
This is utter nonsense for several reasons:
"Church" isn't defined,
JWs and Mormons are certainly unreliable sources for any kind of history,
An body as widespread and established as the Christian Church couldn't possibly "go apostate" in a year.
The writer continues to be deliberately vague and pretends to have resolved the apostasy question. He also fails to distinguish between a formal and a pre-existing informal Canon. He conveniently fails to mention the reason for the Canon in the first place: pseudepigrapha began to circulate.
To reasonable people, the conclusion "that in fact, the church wasn't apostate after all or if it was then the NT cannon and the faith as well is in serious doubt", is inescapable.
The conclusion is not inescapable because the assumptions about the Church and the Cannon have not been established.
The Catholic is unable to live with the contradictions that Jesus established a Church that He promised would endure, that for a period God preserved the church; that He then stopped doing so; that finally He resumed His protection. The Catholic is unable to ignore the way such elaborate and arbitrary theories serve the peculiar convenience of the sects in question, and the fact that the general apostasy herein hypothesized is undetectable in the historical record. Finally, the Catholic is unable to reconcile such fanciful theories with any notion of a faithful God, and rejects with scorn the image of Christ as an absent and vagrant Spouse.
The Pilgrim Church
By E. H. Broadbent
The title of this book is well chosen and calculated to challenge today's reader. Events that took place in the initial phase of the church's history are presented in the record of Scripture, while the most recent events have been well documented. But what of the intervening years, and the chapter of events that bridges the considerable gap between early and latter days?
The survival of the authentic church is proof that God's hand of preservation has rested upon this select, unique company over all the years of existence. Not all the attacks that have been mounted by Satan, many issuing from sources of organized religion, have prevailed to the extinction of the church.
E. H. Broadbent reveals, through his painstaking research, how faithful companies of God's people, with clear attachment to the teaching of the scripture, upheld in their testimony and practices that which God had instituted from the beginning. It makes for thrilling reading and demonstrates the progress of a 'pilgrim church' over centuries of darkness, declension and persecution.
This handsome hard-back edition, of what has long been regarded as a classic account of church history, deserves a place on everyone's bookshelf. Additional to the contents of earlier editions is a collection of maps, in colour, that give indication of the locations and movements of these various groups of Christians
456pp, published by Gospel Folio Press, P.O. Box 2041, Grand Rapids MI 49501-2041. Available in the UK from John Ritchie Ltd., 40 Beansburn, Kilmarnock, KA3 1RH. (ISBN 1-882701-53-4).
Cannon
Canon
Important distinction.
Dan
Biblical Christianity web site
I just read a very entertaining and informative book regarding the start and flowering of the Catholic Church in historical context. It is IMO a great book for history lovers of all denominations.
Triumph - the Power and the Glory of the Catholic Church, a 2000 year history. By H. W. Crocker III
I am a history buff anyway and it seems to me that the author stayed with the facts that we know from the ancient historians and he did not try to "fit" facts to support the Catholic Church and her views.
|
Try using "canon" instead. I recognize a cannon when I see a howitzer.