Which ones? Or am I simply to take your word for it that this is true even though you haven't been speicifc?
Chew on this, dog:
In the 1890s, less than 5% of the Holy Land ’s population was Jewish, yet, Theodore Herzl had the nerve to describe his movement as that of “a people without a land for a land without a people.”
If there were 20 people in all of Palestine then, and one Jew, that would make the statement true, but meaningless.
The Arab population was a kaleidoscope then constantly shifting through the area. The intended inference is obvious and self serving in the circular argument sort of way.
Am I to take a Muslim/Arab propagandist's word for it, just because he says so? What is his source of that figure? Is that relevant in any way, do you think? Muslims are notorious for making up "facts".