Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S.: China has not slowed missile tech exports to Middle East
World Tribune ^ | Monday, January 21, 2002

Posted on 01/21/2002 5:03:54 PM PST by Sawdring

WASHINGTON — U.S. officials said Beijing continues to export missile subsystems and technology to the Middle East in the face of the U.S. war on terrorism and in violation of its pledge in 2000 to stop such proliferation activity. The Bush administration has not detected any slowdown in missile technology exports by China to clients in the Middle East, U.S. officials said. Such nations include Iran and Libya.

China also exports missile components and technology to neighboring North Korea, the officials said. In turn, North Korea sells version of these subsystems to such countries as Egypt, Iran, Libya and Syria, Middle East Newsline reported.

"China continues to be one of [the] world's key sources for missile and WMD-related technology, including to some terrorist sponsoring states," Deputy Defense Undersecretary Lisa Bronson said on Jan. 17. "Chinese firms have provided some important missile related items and assistance to countries like Iran, Libya, and North Korea." Ms. Bronson, who is defense undersecretary for technology security policy and proliferation, told the U.S.-China commission that Washington is concerned by what she termed was Beijing's said "poor record" on proliferation. She said Chinese companies have also supported nonconventional programs in so-called rogue states. These include Iran, Iraq, Syria and North Korea. She did not elaborate.

"Chinese entities have provided extensive support in the past to Pakistan's nuclear and ballistic missile programs and have supported some nuclear and chemical programs in rogue states," she said.

The Commerce Department has cited 19 Chinese entities believed to pose proliferation risks. Huawei Technologies has been accused by Washington of helping Iraq improve its air-defense system.

The Pentagon official said the United States would continue to trade with Beijing. But she said this must fit into what she termed was "the larger national security and foreign policy agenda set by the president, who has said that 'America's next priority to prevent mass terror is to protect against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them.'"


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/21/2002 5:03:54 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hopalong, Askel5, Flamefront, GeronL, Soccer8
Bump!
2 posted on 01/21/2002 5:04:47 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
missile
3 posted on 01/21/2002 5:10:53 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
THE USA LOVES COMMIE CHINA! TILL THEY NUKE US............. bump
4 posted on 01/21/2002 5:12:06 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Whoops, the search page must not be working properly. I did a search before I posted it and didn't find the article. Thanks for pointing it out.
5 posted on 01/21/2002 5:16:01 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Super175
~
6 posted on 01/21/2002 5:18:32 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Aiding and abetting terrorists are they?

I wonder if Russia will let us take on China or whether we're still restricted to choosing between the proferred slate of Third World backwaters the former Soviets would like to tidy up.

7 posted on 01/21/2002 5:51:56 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
great screen name!
8 posted on 01/21/2002 7:36:30 PM PST by TheUglyAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
fyi
9 posted on 01/21/2002 8:51:31 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Thanks for the bump. Again, this goes to show how well the Chicoms hold to treaties (especially the non-proliferation type) they sign...
10 posted on 01/22/2002 9:33:06 AM PST by batter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson