Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2002 11:38:37 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax (limbacher@newsmax.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Carl/NewsMax
Damn, it's starting to look like maybe the "tin foil hat" crowd might not be too far off the mark on this one. Interesting.
3 posted on 01/27/2002 11:45:51 AM PST by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
LINK

Carl:

Can you get Bob Grant or Frank from Queens to interview the police Lt and the NYC fireman mentioned in this article?

4 posted on 01/27/2002 11:52:35 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Have no doubt of this: Had there been only one plane involved on 9/11, the federal government would have concocted an elaborate account of the pilot's deep depression. Desperate to prevent panic and to protect us from our unenlightened selves, Washington will cover up anything it cannot possibly explain away. I'll settle for the truth, thank you very much...
5 posted on 01/27/2002 11:55:49 AM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Still think this might have been a shoe bomber. That was my first thought after that Reid guy tried it. It surely couldn't be the first attempt to do something like that.
7 posted on 01/27/2002 12:02:27 PM PST by MsLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
The NTSB is nothing but a worthless cover-up agency. I would never work for them.

In the hours and days after the crash of flight 587, the NTSB was floating every crackpot theory it could in an effort to disprove theories of terrorism. Their efforts had quite the opposite effect. It tends to kill an organization's credibility when they scream, "It wasn't terrorism, it wasn't terrorism...!" while the crash site is still burning and no data collection has even been done yet, then float every crackpot theory under the sun to "prove" it. What ever happened to the days of the NTSB not commenting on an on-going investigation? I find their actions highly questionable.

8 posted on 01/27/2002 12:06:08 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
But if it was a "bomber" (shoe or otherwise) wouldn't someone (or some group) have taken credit for it ??
I know that bin Laden rarely took credit for "operations" that he was a part of, but after 9-11 that seemed to change.
I would think there would be some sort of bragging or claim of success ??
12 posted on 01/27/2002 12:08:46 PM PST by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
what, you going to believe your own lying eyes (that is, if the film is ever released)?

i won't be convinced until the cia releases their cartoon.

where's the cartoon?

16 posted on 01/27/2002 12:27:21 PM PST by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *AA Flight 587
bump
18 posted on 01/27/2002 12:43:03 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Stall spin. PC spinning otherwise.
20 posted on 01/27/2002 1:03:32 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I think it was a shoe bomber. They may never know. I think there is a "shoe bomber brigade" out there.
22 posted on 01/27/2002 1:35:47 PM PST by Swede Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
What I don't understand is why I am supposed to feel more comfortable believing that planes just fall apart in midair.
25 posted on 01/27/2002 2:30:27 PM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
One theory, argued well.
28 posted on 01/27/2002 4:50:36 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
bump
36 posted on 01/27/2002 8:02:01 PM PST by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"At the end of the bridge videotape sequence, which has been turned over to the FBI, there appears to be a puff of white smoke in the sky."

Right. The puff of smoke is at the END of the sequence -- where one would expect that a plane breaking up in mid air would produce clouds of fuel, etc.

Had the puff of smoke occurred at the BEGINNING of the sequence, then the bomb explanation would at least have some evidence going for it.

So the tinfoilers are wrong again -- batting 0. As usual.

39 posted on 01/27/2002 9:26:54 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Is it just me, or did this story just die? I don't recall anything else after this initial announcement of the video's existance.
56 posted on 02/05/2002 11:51:34 AM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson