Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRULOCK CASE AGAINST WEN HO LEE DISMISSED AT REQUEST OF PRESIDENT BUSH
Judicial Watch ^ | February 12, 2002 | Press release

Posted on 02/12/2002 6:15:54 PM PST by tgslTakoma

Bush Justice Department's Actions Protect Convicted Felon Who Violated National Security

Judicial Watch To Appeal Lower Court's Grant of Bush Administration Request

(Washington, D.C.). Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, has been litigating defamation lawsuits against convicted felon Wen Ho Lee and others who, to deflect blame for their own actions, slandered and libeled Trulock. Specifically, as part of a media, public relations campaign, these defendants claimed in widely published reports that Trulock had singled Wen Ho Lee out for prosecution because he is ethnic Chinese, a variation of the O.J. Simpson defense. As a result, Trulock, a hero who blew the whistle on the biggest breach of nuclear security since the Rosenbergs at Los Alamos National Laboratories, lost his job and had his reputation destroyed.

A later government report which issued in Judicial Watch's litigation on behalf of Trulock proved that he had not engaged in “racial profiling.” Nevertheless, Wen Ho Lee recently published another defamatory book making these and other claims, further damaging Trulock, who is now destitute and penny-less. It hit the bookstores on January 15, 2002.

During discovery in the cases brought for Trulock, Judicial Watch obtained admissions from Wen Ho Lee that he had never been discriminated against, and did not even know what racial profiling is. Further, he was forced to admit that the government had valid reasons to investigate him.(emphasis added)

Nevertheless, just days before trial, which was scheduled to begin February 19, the full weight of the Bush Justice Department was used by the administration to intervene in Judicial Watch's private cases for Trulock, to argue that if the trial was allowed to proceed, that national security would be violated.

The lower court granted the Bush Justice Department's request to stop the cases this afternoon, on the eve of trial. Judicial Watch will appeal on behalf of Trulock.

Already, another case filed before the same court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which was dismissed, has been reinstated by the Fourth Circuit. This reinstated case involves Trulock's claims against former FBI Director Louis Freeh for violating his constitutional rights.

“The Bush Justice Department feared that if the Trulock defamation cases went to trial that it would be embarrassed for allowing Wen Ho Lee to violate national security, and for this reason conjured up a bogus argument, backed by secret CIA affidavits submitted to the court ex parte, that trying this simple defamation case would itself breach national security. This action by the administration amounts to a cover-up of the negligence of the FBI, which allowed Wen Ho Lee to pick the pockets of the American nuclear arsenal. To this day, Lee cannot account for the whereabouts of the secrets he stole,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushclinton; bushknew; busk911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last
I know this will bother some folks here, but it seems fair to believe President Bush was clued in to what his CIA and Justice Department were doing to intervene and kill the case of Notra Trulock to reclaim his good name. The Wen Ho Lee case is a huge embarrassment to the intelligence community--going back to 41's years at the highest levels of the government; and of course, 42's traitorous reign which the current administration prefers to simply move on from, rather than see a patriot like Notra Trulock get the justice he deserves.
1 posted on 02/12/2002 6:15:54 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
This is an outrage!
2 posted on 02/12/2002 6:25:48 PM PST by WillaJohns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
The lower court granted the Bush Justice Department's request to stop the cases this afternoon, on the eve of trial. Judicial Watch will appeal on behalf of Trulock.

Poooooor Mr Trulock.

When the Democrats are against you, and the Republicans are against you , and the Judges are against you.. you have just been pronounced a dead dead (did I mention Lifeless) DUCK.

Larry Klayman lost another round in court.

Kayman is the only lawyer that could sue himself and lose the case.


3 posted on 02/12/2002 6:26:11 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Larry Klayman is a sick individual. His delusional rantings have ceased to be funny.

Almost all of Judicial Watch's lawsuits are dismissed before they even go to trial.

Someone should sue Klayman to find out the identity of the deep pockets behind him and NewsMax. Could it be McCain? Or Perot?

4 posted on 02/12/2002 6:29:08 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
if the trial was allowed to proceed, that national security would be violated.

It makes me wonder if Clinton did much more damage to this nation than we know about. Bush hid it in a hurry, but politically, it would be to his advantage to expose it.

I'm afraid he may be hiding info that would terrify the American people if they knew what Clinton may have really done.

Clinton sold his soul for power, and may have sold more than military secrets. He may have sold all of America ; it's vaunerable areas, it's valuable sites, it's entire network.
Remember, he was training the Chinese military leaders right here in the U.S.
The goverment labratories had an open door policy!

5 posted on 02/12/2002 6:38:55 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Kayman is the only lawyer that could sue himself and lose the case.

Klayman, whatever we might think of him and his motives, has performed a valuable service for the cause of justice in Washington.

Where have our righteous representatives from both parties been hiding?

Why is our justice department so interested in killing a low level defamation suit?

6 posted on 02/12/2002 6:39:29 PM PST by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator; bayourod
"Already, another case filed before the same court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which was dismissed, has been reinstated by the Fourth Circuit. This reinstated case involves Trulock's claims against former FBI Director Louis Freeh for violating his constitutional rights."

You might have missed this part when you skimmed through the headline... if you've been paying attention, this was one of several reversals on appeal recently that Judicial Watch has won for its clients. I'm pleased that there are still a few good men willing to stand up for truth and integrity in government.

7 posted on 02/12/2002 6:42:56 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: map
Why is our justice department so interested in killing a low level defamation suit?

Because of all the high level info that may be attached to it. Klayman is the wrong man to have on the case. He's too coo-coo.

8 posted on 02/12/2002 6:43:51 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I'm afraid he may be hiding info that would terrify the American people if they knew what Clinton may have really done.

Our president would be negligent if he were to hide such information from the nation. We are not his children.

9 posted on 02/12/2002 6:46:47 PM PST by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Shhhh-UT! One Adam-12 see the man. Uh, I mean, sue the man....

Hey! What time is it? It's time to sue someone!


10 posted on 02/12/2002 6:47:30 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator; blackbag
Kayman is the only lawyer that could sue himself and lose the case.

What an idiotic statement. You don't know what you're talking about on this one.

11 posted on 02/12/2002 6:49:16 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Very nice. Lee the traitor is further rewarded for stealing nuclear secrets that have not been recovered. And, Wen Ho Lee has been so emboldened by his manipulation of the system that he is brazenly demanding apologies and "compensation". He will probably receive both if he hasn't already. Meanwhile, the government has thanked Trulock's patriotism and integrity by ruining his reputation and destroying his career.
12 posted on 02/12/2002 6:51:44 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
It doesn't make any difference to these apologists here that when Clinton was the target, Judicial Watch was a collection of Heros. Now they proclaim JW and Klayman villans.

And they can't see their own Blind Partisanship. What a Sick Pair of Parties in charge.

13 posted on 02/12/2002 6:52:07 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
At least they don't pretend anymore.
14 posted on 02/12/2002 6:53:39 PM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Because of all the high level info that may be attached to it.

It's my understanding that the government had already intervened and had been allowed by the court to have classification officers present at depositions to protect national security. The same could have been done for the trial.

"Nothing to see here, folks. Just move along...."

15 posted on 02/12/2002 6:55:50 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Klayman is the wrong man to have on the case. He's too coo-coo

It appears to me that you believe Mr.Trulock is a fraud. If otherwise, please introduce Mr. Trulock to a competent attorney. Are there any honest lawyers in DC?

16 posted on 02/12/2002 6:58:40 PM PST by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
It doesn't make any difference to these apologists here that when Clinton was the target, Judicial Watch was a collection of Heros. Now they proclaim JW and Klayman villans.

Because we thought they could actually bring justice. They brought nothing, and it was handed to them on a silver platter.
What have they done ? Why even bother with them now?

17 posted on 02/12/2002 6:58:45 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
This is just pitiful news...and VERY telling.
18 posted on 02/12/2002 7:00:37 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I'm afraid he may be hiding info that would terrify the American people if they knew what Clinton may have really done.

I'm willing to bet the farm that that is exactly what is going on. Sorry to say, the current administration is covering up so that the masses won't be scared more than necessary. That is why, whenever a post-9/11 plane crash occurs, the NTSB screams 'It wasn't terrorism!! It wasn't terrorism!' and floats every cracked theory there is to "prove" it while the crash is still smoking. This is utterly ridiculous.

I think that GW is covering up for Klinton because he feels a duty to restore the presidency to the dignity that it once had. I'm real sorry that the White House is having a PR problem from the last president, but we need to know the truth of what the last president did. To do anything else is dereliction of duty.

19 posted on 02/12/2002 7:01:06 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz;Common Tator; blackbag
What an idiotic statement. You don't know what you're talking about on this one.

Oh, he's right on. Klayman is a has been. Seriously.

20 posted on 02/12/2002 7:06:16 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson